![\"\"](\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/vernier-001_000.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
IN<\/strong> a recent letter exchange, an atheist said to me,<\/p>\n If sufficient evidence was shown to me, I would start witnessing for Jesus tomorrow. I don’t know what that evidence would be, but I’m sure an all-powerful, all-knowing deity such as Yahweh would know what it would take to get me to believe. So that means Yahweh must not want me to believe (at least at this time), otherwise Yahweh could show me the evidence.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Is it that God does not want this atheist to believe at this time, or is it that this atheist is not prepared to believe in God? That is, is he applying the principles of the “scientific method” to the Creator Himself?<\/p>\n SCIENCE VS. RELIGION?<\/p>\n Atheist, Richard Dawkins, wrote recently about “Science vs. Religion”. Those very words are, for the Christian, a contradiction. There is no conflict between science and religion, provided science humbly recognizes its limitations as well as ethical boundaries. Likewise, I might add, religion must also recognize that not all things in the Bible are to be taken literally, and that science continues to unfold for us a deeper understanding of Creation. Case in point: the Hubble telescope has revealed to us wonders that hundreds of generations before us never thought possible.<\/p>\n Consequently, methodical research in all the branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things of faith derive from the same God<\/span><\/strong><\/span>. <\/span>\u2014Catechism of the Catholic Church<\/em>, n. 159<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Science tells us about the world God created. But can science tell us about God Himself?<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n MEASURING GOD<\/p>\n When a scientist measures temperature, he uses a thermal device; when he measures size, he may use a caliper, and so forth. But how does one “measure God” to satisfy the atheist’s need for concrete proof of His existence (since as I explained in The Painful Irony<\/a><\/em>, the order of creation, miracles, prophecy, etc. mean nothing to him)? The scientist does not use a caliper to measure temperature no more than he uses a thermometer to measure size. The right tools<\/em> have to be used to produce the right evidence<\/em>. When it comes to God, who is spirit<\/em>, the tools to produce divine evidence are not calipers or thermometers. How could they be?<\/p>\n Now, the atheist cannot simply say, “Well, that’s why there’s no God.” Take for example, then, love<\/em>. When an atheist says he loves another, ask him to “prove it.” So too, there are other attributes of man that science fails to fully explain:<\/p>\n Evolution cannot explain the development of free will, morality, or conscience. There is no evidence for the gradual development of these human characteristics\u2014there is no partial morality in chimpanzees. Humans are obviously greater than the sum of whatever evolutionary forces and raw materials are said to have combined to create them.<\/span><\/strong> \u2014Bobby Jindal, Atheism’s Gods, <\/em>Catholic.com<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n So when it comes to God, one must use the proper tools to “measure” Him.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n CHOOSING THE RIGHT TOOLS<\/p>\n First of all, just as he does in science, the atheist has to understand the nature of the subject he is approaching to “study.” The Christian God is not the sun or a bull or a molten calf. He is the Creator Spiritus.<\/em>The atheist must also account for the anthropological roots of men:<\/p>\n In many ways, throughout history down to the present day, men have given expression to their quest for God in their religious beliefs and behavior: in their prayers, sacrifices, rituals, meditations, and so forth. These forms of religious expression, despite the ambiguities they often bring with them, are so universal that one may well call man a religious being.<\/em><\/strong><\/span> \u2014CCC<\/em>, n. 28<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Man is a religious being, but he is also an intelligent being capable of knowing God with certainty from the created world by the natural light of reason. This, because he is made “in the image of God.”<\/p>\n In the historical conditions in which he finds himself, however, man experiences many difficulties in coming to know God by the light of reason alone… there are many <\/span> In this insightful passage from the Catechism, the tools for “measuring God” are revealed. Because we have a fallen nature prone to doubt and denial, the soul in search of God is called to “self-surrender and abnegation.” In a word, faith. <\/em>Scripture puts it this way:<\/p>\n …without faith it is impossible to please him, for anyone who approaches God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him. (Heb 11:6)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n APPLYING THE TOOLS<\/p>\n Now, the atheist might say, “Wait a minute. I don’t <\/em>believe God exists, so how can I approach Him in faith?”<\/p>\n The first thing is to understand how terrible the wound of sin is to human nature (and certainly the atheist will admit that man is capable of terrors). Original sin is not just an inconvenient blip on the human historical radar. Sin produced death in man to such a great degree that communion with God was severed. The first sin of Adam and Eve What does this mean? Again, one must use the right tools. It means approaching Him in the way He has shown us to:<\/p>\n …unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven… he is found by those who do not test him,\u00a0and manifests himself to those who do not disbelieve him.\u00a0(Matt 18:3; Wis 1:2)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n This is far from simplistic. To become “like children,” that is, to experience the evidence of God<\/em> means several things. One is to accept who He says He is: “God is love.” In fact, the atheist often rejects Christianity because he has been given a distorted perception of the Father as a deity who watches with squinted eyes our every error, ready to punish our guilt. This is not the Christian God, but at best the Misunderstood God. When we understand that we are loved, unconditionally, this not only changes our perception of God, but reveals the shortcomings of those who are Christianity’s leaders (and thus their need for salvation too).<\/p>\n Second, becoming a child means following in the commandments of Our Lord. The atheist who thinks He can experience the evidence of God the Creator while living as an enemy against His created order (ie. natural moral law) through a life of sin, does not understand basic principles of logic. The supernatural “joy” and “peace” Christians testify to is a direct result of submitting to the Creator’s moral order, a process called “repentance.” As Jesus said:<\/p>\n Whoever remains in me and I in him will bear much fruit…\u00a0If you keep my commandments, you will remain in my love…\u00a0I have told you this so that my joy may be in you and your joy may be complete. (John 15:5, 10-11)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n So faith\u00a0and\u00a0<\/em>obedience are necessary tools to experience and encounter God.\u00a0A scientist will never measure the correct temperature of a liquid if he refuses to place the temperature probe in the fluid. It must be said that one can certainly experience the truth of God’s word through a life opposed to His moral order. As Scripture says, the “wages of sin is death.” [1]<\/sup><\/a>Rom 6:23<\/span><\/span>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n\n
![\"\"](\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/love_001.jpg\")
But love cannot be measured, weighed, poked, or prodded, so how can love exist? And yet, the atheist who loves says, “All I know is that I love her. I know this with all my heart.” He might claim as evidence of his love his acts of kindness, service, or passion. But these very outward signs exist among those who are devoted to God and live by the Gospel\u2014signs which have transformed not only individuals but entire nations. However, the atheist excludes these as evidence of God. Therefore, an atheist cannot prove that his love exists either. There are simply no tools to measure it.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
![\"\"](\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/thinkingman2.jpg\")
obstacles which prevent reason from the effective and fruitful use of this inborn faculty. For the truths that concern the relations between God and man wholly transcend the visible order of things, and, if they are translated into human action and influence it, they call for self-surrender and abnegation. The human mind, in its turn, is hampered in the attaining of such truths, not only by the impact of the senses and the imagination, but also by disordered appetites which are the consequences of original sin. So it happens that men in such matters easily persuade themselves that what they would not like to be true is false or at least doubtful.<\/span><\/strong> \u2014CCC<\/em>, n. 37<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
![\"\"](\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/thomas.jpg\")
was not stealing a piece of fruit; it was an utter lack of trust<\/em> in their Father. What I am saying is that even the Christian at times, despite his foundational faith in God, doubts as did Thomas. We doubt because we forget not only what God has done in our own lives, but we forget (or are ignorant of) the powerful interventions of God throughout human history. We doubt because we are weak. Indeed, if God were to appear in the flesh before mankind again, we would crucify Him all over again. Why? Because we are saved by grace through faith, not sight. Yes, fallen nature is that<\/em> weak (see Why Faith?<\/a><\/em>). The fact that even the Christian has to renew his faith at times is not proof of God’s absence but of sin and weakness’s presence. The only way to approach God, then, is in faith\u2014trust<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n
\n
![\"\"](\"\/blog\/wp-images\/oil-and-water.jpg\" "\\"\\"")
So too, the atheist will not have a relationship with God if his thoughts and actions are in opposition to the character of God. Oil and water do not mix. On the other hand, through faith<\/em>, he can experience the love and mercy of God no matter what his past has been. By trust in God’s mercy, humble obedience <\/em>to\u00a0His Word, the grace of the Sacraments, and in that conversation we call “prayer,” the soul can come to experience God. Christianity stands or falls on this reality, not on ornate cathedrals and golden vessels. The blood of the martyrs was shed, not for an ideology or empire, but a Friend.<\/p>\n