![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.markmallett.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/climaterevolution2.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
THERE<\/strong> is a queasy feeling in my soul. For fifteen years, I have written about a coming Global Revolution<\/em><\/a>, of\u00a0When Communism Returns<\/em><\/a> and the encroaching\u00a0Hour of Lawlessness<\/em><\/a>\u00a0that is being fomented by the subtle but powerful censorship through\u00a0Political Correctness<\/a>. <\/em>I have shared both interior words<\/a> I have received in prayer as well as, far more importantly, the words of the pontiffs and Our Lady<\/a> that sometimes span centuries. They warn of a coming revolution<\/em> that would seek to overthrow the entire present order:<\/p>\n No longer making any secret of their purposes, they are now boldly rising up against God Himself \u2026that which is their ultimate purpose forces itself into view\u2014namely, the utter overthrow of that whole religious and political order of the world which the Christian teaching has produced, and the substitution of a new state of things in accordance with their ideas, of which the foundations and laws shall be drawn from mere naturalism.<\/strong> \u2014POPE LEO XIII, Humanum Genus<\/em><\/a>, Encyclical on Freemasonry, n.10, Apri 20thl, 1884<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Even though I’ve written of these things for many years, I am nonetheless disturbed as I watch souls blindly fall into deception.\u00a0For all of a sudden, the pieces are rapidly coming together in a sobering picture. We are, it seems, on the very cusp of a radical destabilization of the entire world, including the Church\u2014an upheaval the likes of which mankind has never known. Indeed, the motto of that secret society of Freemasons driving much of what we see today is Ordo ab chaos:\u00a0<\/em>“Order out of chaos.”\u00a0Sometimes, we can only understand prophecy in hindsight once events have happened. I believe such is the case now as we glimpse what is behind the present global revolution…<\/p>\n <\/p>\n GLOBAL WARMING: SAVING THE PLANET?<\/p>\n The Antichrist will fool many people because he will be viewed as a humanitarian with a fascinating personality, who espouses vegetarianism, pacifism, human rights and environmentalism.<\/strong>\u00a0 \u2014Cardinal Biffi, London Times<\/em>, Friday, March 10, 2000, referring to a portrait of the Antichrist in Vladimir Soloviev\u2019s book, War, Progress and the End of History\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n There is no question that mankind is harming the planet. In\u00a0The Great Poisoning<\/a>,\u00a0<\/em>I went into vast detail regarding the literal poisoning of the earth and all its inhabitants. But here’s the terrible irony in all of this: it’s apparently not the cocktails of pharmaceutical drugs, the coatings on our cookware, the poisons we spray on our crops, the aerosols we release in the atmosphere, the chemicals in our food, vaccines, makeup, water or a hundred other things we ingest or breath daily that is the No, the real demon is “global warming.” The claim has been made that mankind is, in fact, “poisoning” the planet with CO2 and that we only have about 12 years to go<\/a> before the world ends (never mind that such apocalyptic scenarios have failed dozens<\/a>\u00a0and dozens<\/a> of times). But carbon dioxide is not only not<\/em> a pollutant, it’s necessary for plant life\u2014it’s plant food<\/em>. The higher the levels of CO2, the more the planet thrives. It is a historical fact that when the planet has cooled, growing periods were reduced, food supplies worsened, diseases increased and nations were thrown into instability (and the correlation between CO2 and warming, or lack thereof, has never been substantiated either, given other more crucial factors such as solar energy, ocean currents, etc.). As climate change scientist and researcher Tomas Sheahen explains:<\/p>\n It is a major mistake to conflate climate change with pollution. They\u2019re two entirely different matters. We do not know how to control the climate, but we do<\/em> know how to control pollution.<\/strong> \u2014October 12th, 2016; LifeSiteNews.com<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Yet, we have been told that there is a “scientific consensus” that the planet is warming due to anthropogenic (man-made) causes. The problem, however, is not only that several experts in the field of climatology refute this so-called consensus, but they are being excluded by the mainstream media and even the Vatican Pontifical Academy of Sciences<\/a> from presenting their scientific knowledge. Such censorship is the very antithesis<\/em> of science; to question facts and hypotheses is the very nature and foundation of scientific inquiry. The present climate is, in fact, anti-science<\/em>, which actually exposes a spiritual dimension. As St. Paul said:<\/p>\n Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. (2 Corinthians 3:17)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n The same spirit that is shutting down debate regarding the true nature of marriage, the unborn, gender, etc. is the same lying spirit at work now. For as I have detailed in several articles (see Related Reading below), the \u2022 Dr. Mototaka Nakamura is a renowned computer climate modeller. In June 2019, he published “Confessions of a climate scientist: the global warming hypothesis is an unproven hypothesis.”\u00a0<\/em>In it, he explains how computer models (the very ones being used right now as a basis for predicting global warming) are terribly inaccurate at making predictions for a number of reasons<\/a>, and cannot be considered reliable. Remarkably, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that is driving the “global warming” agenda, stated in their third report:<\/p>\n In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.<\/strong> [(Chapter 14, Section 14.2.2.2. )]<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n \u2022 Dr. Patrick Michaels, former Virginia State Climatologist, stated:\u00a0<\/p>\n It is nowhere near as warm as it\u2019s \u2018supposed\u2019 to be. The computer models are making systematic, dramatic errors.<\/strong> \u2014broadcast with host Mark Levine<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n \u2022 In 2000, NASA published the work of Serbian astrophysicist Milutin Milankovitch (but has since “archived” it) and what has become known as the “Milankovitch cycles<\/a>.” He is best known, NASA notes, “for developing one of the most significant theories<\/a> relating Earth motions and long-term climate change.” The shape of the Earth\u2019s orbit changes from being elliptical (high eccentricity) to being nearly circular (low eccentricity) in a cycle that takes between 90,000 and 100,000 years. His theories were later proven to be true:<\/p>\n …in 1976, a study published in the journal Science\u00a0<\/i>examined deep-sea sediment cores and found that Milankovitch’s theory did in fact correspond to periods of climate change… Since this study, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences has embraced the Milankovitch Cycle model.<\/strong> \u2014NASA, March 24th, 2000; earthobservatory.nasa.gov\u00a0<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n \u2022 Dr. Fred Singer is an expert in remote sensing measurements, having served as founding director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service, vice-chair of the U.S. National Advisory Committee on Oceans and Atmosphere, deputy Let\u2019s understand that the world\u2019s mean temperatures have been rising at a pretty constant rate of about one degree Fahrenheit (0.6oC) over the past 100 years, and are likely to continue, although with both warmer and cooler fluctuations, for many hundreds of years into the future. Over each of the past several centuries, including the last one, sea levels rose by about 7 inches (18 cm). Accordingly, neither the overall warming trend or sea level rise began with the fossil-burning Industrial Revolution\u2026 nor have they changed in any detectable way due to human influences. And we can\u2019t even really know that the second follows the first. Sea levels rose during the Little Ice Age from about 1400-1859 AD\u2026 a period which was considerably colder than now.<\/strong> \u2014September 24th, 2013, Forbes.com<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n \u00a0\u2022 Dr. James P. Wallace III, Dr. John R. Christy, and Dr. Joseph S. D\u2019Aleo’s peer-reviewed study<\/a> revealed that when accounting for El Ninos and La Ninas, which are \u201cthe fluctuations in temperature between the ocean and atmosphere in the east-central Equatorial Pacific\u201d that \u201coccur on average every two to seven years,\u201d there has been a flat-line temperature trend since 1997. No warming. Indeed, as the U.S. Chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology noted in The Washington Times<\/i>, The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is deliberately leaving out crucial satellite data from its climate projections.<\/p>\n Atmospheric satellite data, considered by many to be the most objective, has clearly showed no warming for the past two decades. This fact is well documented, but has been embarrassing for an administration determined to push through costly environmental regulations.<\/b> \u2014Lamar Smith, The Washington Times<\/i>, Nov. 26th, 2015<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n \u2022 Canadian scientists<\/a> as well as the 2016 Scientific Working Group<\/a> found that polar bears are not in decline and that their populations are either stable or increasing.<\/p>\n \u2022 In an open letter to the United Nations, more than 500 prominent scientists from all over the world, including distinguished MIT Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, Richard Lindzen, are urging the Secretary-General of the United Nations to engage a less political and more scientific debate of “global warming.” In the letter, they note that present climate policy relies on inadequate models, that global warming has not increased natural disasters and that CO2 is not a pollutant. The undersigned state:<\/p>\n ...it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models. Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.<\/strong> \u2014September 24th, 2019; cf. climategate.nl<\/a>, <\/span>breitbart.com<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n GLOBAL WARMING: CATALYST OF REVOLUTION<\/p>\n There is something far more insidious than merely quashing scientific data and debate. The fact is that “global warming” (whether man-made or not) is being used to spark a revolution to overturn the present order, particularly the economic<\/em> order. In a word, it is being used to deconstruct the free market system and impose socialistic principles of wealth redistribution, ie. Communism… not to mention, an excuse to reduce the population of the planet.<\/p>\n In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity\u00a0<\/i>itself.<\/b> \u2014Alexander King & Bertrand Schneider (on the agenda of The Club of Rome),\u00a0The First Global Revolution<\/i>, p. 75, 1993<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n It’s worth noting that, if the political Left has an agenda, so does the political Right. The hegemony of major oil companies, backed by neo-conservatives, has been preserved at an unspeakable cost\u2014from global wars to the prevention of new technologies that would provide low-cost or even free energy to the world. To be certain, the present system is\u00a0<\/em>corrupt; the present structure of a grossly inflated cost of living\u00a0is\u00a0<\/em>enslaving and suppressing billions.[1]<\/sup><\/a>cf. Capitalism and the Beast<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/span>\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.markmallett.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/thepoisoning-1024x682.jpg\")
problem\u2014these, we’re told, have been deemed “safe” by our government panels.<\/p>\n\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.markmallett.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/politicallycorrect-1024x1024.jpg\")
“science” being fed to schoolchildren and the public via<\/em> the mainstream media<\/a> has been found to be manipulated and mangled by errant computer models, deleted data sets, or outright falsification of the facts (ie. “Climategate”). It would be laughable were it not for the grave consequences this has for the future, as I will explain in a moment. It is absolutely stunning that hundreds if not thousands of serious and credible voices in the field of climate science are not only being ignored but silenced. Here are but a few:\u00a0<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.markmallett.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/earthclimate-1024x1024.jpg\")
assistant administrator for policy at the EPA, and as a reviewer for several of the IPCC reports. He firmly refutes the connection Al Gore and his disciples have asserted that fossil fuel activity is going to cause coastlines to flood:<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n