Он пандемия жомогу

Марк Маллетт CTV News Edmonton (CFRN TV) каналынын мурдагы сыйлыкка ээ болгон журналисти жана Канадада жашайт.

БУЛ Жер планетасындагы башка жылдардан айырмаланган жыл. Көптөр бир нерсе бар экенин терең билишет абдан туура болуп жатат. Атынын артында канчалаган PhD докторлору болсо дагы, эч кимдин пикирин айтууга болбойт. Эч ким мындан ары өз алдынча медициналык чечим чыгарууга эркиндикке ээ эмес ("Менин денем, менин тандоом" колдонулбайт). Эч кимге цензурага алынбастан же карьерасынан четтетилбестен ачык түрдө фактыларды тартууга уруксат берилбейт. Тескерисинче, биз күчтүү пропаганданы эске салган мезгилге кирдик коркутуу кампаниялары бул өткөн кылымдын эң кайгылуу диктатурасынан (жана геноциддеринен) мурун. Коомдук саламаттык - "Коомдук саламаттык" үчүн - Гитлердин планынын борбору болгон.  

Демократиялык коомдордо коомдук саламаттыкты сактоо муктаждыктары кээде жарандардан көбүрөөк жакшылык үчүн курмандыктарды талап кылат, бирок нацисттик Германияда улуттук же коомдук ден соолук - Коомдук саламаттык - жеке саламаттык сактоого караганда толук артыкчылыкка ээ болгон. Дарыгерлер жана медициналык жактан даярдалган академиктер, алардын көбү "расалык гигиенанын", же эвгениканын жактоочулары, мыйзамдаштырылган жана Германиянын коомун улуттун ден соолугуна биологиялык коркунуч катары караган адамдардан "тазалоого" багытталган нацисттик саясатты ишке ашырууга жардам беришкен. -Коомдук саламаттыктын атынан - Нацисттик расалык гигиена, доктор Сюзан Бахрах.

CNNдин Дон Лемону "эмделбегендерди" чакыруу менен азык -түлүк дүкөндөрүнөн тыюу салынган, же Пирс Морган эмделбегендерди талап кылат саламаттыкты сактоого тыюу салынган, Коомдук саламаттык көбүк өч алуу менен кайтып келди - бул жолу өздөрүнүн күчтүү табигый иммунитетине ишенүүгө батынган жаман, өзүмчүл дени сак адамдарга каршы, миңдеген жылдар мурунку урпактары кылгандай. Ал тургай, "тобокелчилиги жогору адамдар" үчүн концентрациялык "лагерлердин" болушу (б.а. эмделбегендер?) Эч кандай кутум теориясы эмес жана ал жөнүндө кеңири жазылган. Ооруларды көзөмөлдөө борборлорунун (CDC) веб -сайты. Биз баш тартуу үчүн сүйлөп жатып, көптөр жумушунан айрылып жатканы бул чындыкты үйгө алып келет. Биз, балким, адамзат тарыхындагы эң бөлүнүүчү жана кыйратуучу мезгилдердин бирине багыт алдык - жана пропаганда дагы бир жолу башкы ролду ойнойт.

Of course, for those with an indomitable faith in the media (“They would never lie to us”), I’ll just remind them again of how the mainstream media silenced, opposed, and censored anyone  who suggested that the current coronavirus originated from a laboratory in Wuhan where it was undergoing “gain of function” research (ie. creating a bioweapon).^[1]Түштүк Кытайдын Технологиялык Университетинин бир макаласында "өлтүргүч коронавирус Ухандагы лабораториядан чыккан болушу мүмкүн" деп айтылат (16-февраль, 2020-жыл; dailymail.co.uk) 2020-жылдын февраль айынын башында АКШнын "Биологиялык куралдар жөнүндө" мыйзамын түзгөн доктор Фрэнсис Бойл 2019-жылдын Ухан Коронавирусу - бул биологиялык согуш куралы экендигин жана Бүткүл Дүйнөлүк Саламаттык сактоо Уюму (ДССУ) буга чейин билгенин моюнга алып, кеңири билдирүү жасады. . (cf. zerohedge.comИзраилдик биологиялык согушту талдоочу дагы ушуну айтты (26-январь, 2020-жыл; washtontimes.com) Энгелхардт Молекулярдык Биология Институтунун жана Россия Илимдер Академиясынын доктору Питер Чумаков "Вухан илимпоздорунун коронавирусту түзүүдөгү максаты зыяндуу эмес, тескерисинче, алар вирустун патогендүүлүгүн изилдөөгө аракет кылышты ... Алар таптакыр жинди кылышты" нерселер ... Мисалы, вируска адам клеткаларын жуктуруу мүмкүнчүлүгүн берген геномго киргизилген. "(zerohedge.com) Профессор Люк Монтанье, Медицина боюнча 2008-жылдагы Нобель сыйлыгынын лауреаты жана 1983-жылы ВИЧ вирусун ачкан адам, SARS-CoV-2 Кытайдын Ухан шаарындагы лабораториядан кокустан чыгып кеткен, манипуляцияланган вирус деп ырастоодо. mercola.com) A жаңы даректүү тасмаБир нече илимпоздун сөздөрүнө шилтеме жасап, COVID-19ну вирус деп эсептешет. (mercola.comАвстралиялык окумуштуулар тобу коронавирус романында "адамдын кийлигишүүсүнүн" белгилерин көрсөткөн жаңы далилдерди келтиришти. (lifesitenews.com; washtontimes.com) Британиялык M16 чалгындоо агенттигинин мурунку башчысы сэр Ричард Дирлов COVID-19 вирусу лабораторияда жаратылып, кокустан жайылып кеткен деп эсептээрин айтты. (jpost.comБритандык-норвегиялык биргелешкен изилдөө Wuhan коронавирусу (COVID-19) Кытай лабораториясында курулган "химера" деп ырастоодо. (Taiwannews.com) Профессор Джузеппе Тритто, биотехнология жана нанотехнология боюнча эл аралык белгилүү эксперт жана президент Дүйнөлүк биомедициналык илимдер жана технологиялар академиясы (WABT) "Бул Ухан Вирусология Институтунун P4 (жогорку камтылган) лабораториясында кытайлык аскерлер көзөмөлдөгөн программада генетикалык жактан иштелип чыккан" деп айтылат. (lifesitnews.com) Бежиндин коронавирус жөнүндө корутунду чыкканга чейин эле Гонг-Конгдон качып кеткен Гонконгдон качып кеткен урматтуу кытайлык вирусолог, доктор Ли-Менг Ян: “Ухандагы эт базары түтүн булатат жана бул вирус табиятынан эмес ... Ухандагы лабораториядан келет. ”(dailymail.co.uk CDCдин мурунку директору Роберт Редфилд дагы COVID-19 "ыктымал" Ухан лабораториясынан чыккан деп айтат. (washtonexaminer.com) But now, this “conspiracy theory” is widely accepted as fact. 

"Кутум теоретиктери" деп аталган нерселер көбүнчө үй тапшырмасын аткарган тырышчаак адамдар эмес, көбүнчө кылдат иштелип чыккан жана өтө көзөмөлдөнгөн баянды окуган акы төлөнүүчү журналисттерден айырмаланышат. Чынында, жаңы изилдөө эң "вакцина тартынбагандар" PhD даражасы барлар экени аныкталды.^[2]11-август, 2021-жыл; unherd.com Бул тууралуу ойлонуп көрөлү.

What else has the media gotten wrong?

THE TOP TEN FABLES

I have compiled the Top Ten Pandemic Fables that are constantly streaming across mainstream news. CNN, for example, is a veritable dumpster fire of pseudo-science and propaganda the likes of which I’ve never seen in my lifetime since I became a member of the media in the mid-90’s. Don’t get me wrong; I don’t think CNN and their likes (on both the “left” and “right”) are just abusing journalism; they’re actually a threat to democracy. Their use of fear and convenient omission of facts to manipulate the public is not journalism but what Pope Francis once aptly compared to копрофилия: the arousal from excrement or feces.

Тынчсыздануу түйшүгүн талкалап, "жаман кабарга" тынымсыз көңүл буруудан улам пайда болгон коркуу сезимин токтотушубуз керек деп ишенем ... Бул адамдардын азаптуу трагедиясына көңүл бурбай турган жалган маалыматтарды таратууга эч кандай тиешеси жок. жамандыктын ызы-чуусунан көз жуумган опоңой оптимизм жөнүндө. —Поп Франсис, 24-январь, 2017-жыл, usatoday.com; карагыла. Фейк Жанылыктар, Чыныгы Революция

David Redman, a former head of the Alberta Emergency Management Agency, writes in his recent paper: "Канаданын COVID-19га өлүмдүү жообу":

Канаданын "кулпулоо" жообу чыныгы вирус, COVID-10дан сактап калгандан кеминде 19 эсе көп өлтүрөт. Өзгөчө кырдаал учурунда коркуунун акылга сыйбас түрдө колдонулушу, бийликке болгон ишенимдин бузулушуна алып келди, ал он жылга же андан көпкө созулат. Биздин демократияга зыян жок дегенде бир муунга жетет. - 2021 -жылдын июлу, 5 -бет, "Канаданын COVID-19га өлүмдүү жообу":

Of course, your first question may be what makes this кийинки list any more true than the mainstream media’s? For one, we are actually citing world renowned experts and official documentation — not in-house media doctors, insiders with the CDC or WHO, Pharma-friendly spokesmen, or anonymous “fact-checkers.” Second, we aren’t censoring opposing views and present the data and studies, which are open to further analysis and criticism (which is what science used to do). Third, we are citing the long standing science that was often quietly and conveniently, and without evidence, changed in the last year in order to create a greater crisis than there actually is.^[3]cf. Гейтске каршы иш Fourth, those speaking up against the highly controlled news narrative are being punished for doing so, which begs the question: why would they risk their entire careers and livelihood to go counter to the propaganda machine? Fifth, unlike Facebook’s fact-checker who is funded by a group with $1.9 billion in stocks in a vaccine company, there is no monetary gain for those defending actual science these days. 

The disease “COVID-19” is not a hoax… but the scale of this crisis certainly has been. Here is why actual experts say so…  

1. PCR TESTING 

Абдан талаштуу Полимераздык чынжыр реакциясы (ПТР) tests are what have been used worldwide to test the populace for the coronavirus: SARS-CoV-2. However, several international courts have condemned the tests as “not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2″^[4]Португалия: geopolitic.org/2020/11/21; the Austrian courts have ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns have no legal or scientific basis. greatgameindia.com and in December 2020, a published study confirmed that “The certainty of the evidence was judged as very low due to the risk of bias, indirectness, and inconsistency issues.” 

The reason is very straightforward. A sample swab of RNA is taken from your nasal cavity and then amplified a set number of cycles. Dr. Anthony Fauci, who also advises President Joe Biden on the pandemic, himself warned:

If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule… it’s just dead nucleotides [above that]. —9:16 mark in documentary Илимдин артынан?

However, inexplicably, the CDC recommended that testing go to within 40 ирекет ^[5]pg. 34, https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download and the World Health Organization (WHO) at 45 ирекет. ^[6]cf. 9:44 mark in documentary Илимдин артынан? So, for example, the Kansas Health and Environmental Laboratories used 42 cycles.^[7]communitycareks.org This criteria created what the New York Times reported to be a landslide of false-positive results of “up to 90 percent”^[8]nytimes.com/2020/08/29 leading health organizations around the world to declare a veritable “casedemic” that continues to this hour. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons published an макаласында "COVID-19: Бизде коронавирус пандемиясы барбы же ПТР тест пандемиясы барбы?"^[9]7-октябрь, 2020-жыл; aapsonline.org while the Bulgarian Pathology Association declared, “COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless.”^[10]7-январь, 2020-жыл, bpa-pathology.com 

A massive German study published in The Journal of Infection in December of 2020 concluded:

In light of our findings that more than half of individuals with positive PCR test results are unlikely to have been infectious, RT-PCR test positivity should not be taken as an accurate measure of infectious SARS-CoV-2 incidence. — “The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population”, December 8th, 2020; journalofinfection.com

Then, in a surprise turnabout in July 2021, the CDC abruptly dropped its recommendation for the PCR test calling for something capable of distinguishing between SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal influenza — a stunning admission of the test’s limitations. No wonder, reports Yahoo:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged labs this week to stock clinics with kits that can test for both the коронавирус жана грипп "сасык тумоо" жакындаган сайын… Бар болчу 646 ыстатыйалара 2020 -жылы чоңдор арасындагы сасык тумоого байланыштуу, ал эми 2019 -жылы CDC алардын ортосунда деп эсептеген 24,000 жана 62,000 people died from influenza-related illnesses. —24-июль, 2021-жыл; yahoo.com

Oops. Oh well. Nonetheless, the PCR tests, to this day, continue to be used to report “cases” — even though the tests, by themselves, are indeed “scientifically meaningless,” leading Dr. Astrid Stückelberger, PhD, who works with the WHO, to call the tests “intentionally criminal.”^[11]Доктор Райнер Фуэльмич менен маектешүү; mercola.com She wasn’t alone:

This is a blatant lie and it’s being done all over the world… the PCR method developed by [Dr. Terry] Mullis who got the Nobel prize for this, he himself said, do not use this test for diagnosis… In fact, this test should be trashed immediately worldwide, and it should be considered a criminal act for anyone to be sent to quarantine because this test was positive. —Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Interview, dryburgh.com, 12-февраль, 2021-жыл

2. “CASES”

In one of the greatest “sleight of hands” of the century, the media began reporting these “positive tests” as “cases.” But not only do we know now that the hysteria created by those “case” numbers on your TV screen are grossly жалган, but the very use of the term “case” has been abused.

The medical term “case” always referred to someone who was actually sick — until 2020. Now anyone who tests “positive” is deemed a “case,” even if they have no symptoms or active viral infection. “They’re testing people and calling them ‘cases’. That is not epidemiology — that’s fraud,” declared Dr. Lee Merritt, former President of the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons.^[12]Кырсыкка даярдануу боюнча доктурлар лекциясы, 16-август, 2020-жыл, Лас Вегас, Невада; видео бул жерде 

A case is normally somebody who has symptoms, it is not normally somebody who is completely healthy. So what we’ve done by confusing positive tests with cases is basically class a huge number of people who are immune to the disease as having the disease. That’s a massive misconception. —Dr. John Lee, NHS (National Health Service) pathologist in the UK. cf. 14:06 mark Илимдин артынан?

3. ASYMPTOMATIC “CASES” ARE A THREAT

Entire countries began to lockdown the healthy, and continue to do so today, treating them as a viral “threat” — an unprecedented measure in pandemic history. In fact, says the former Vice President and Chief Scientist of vaccine manufacturer Pfizer, it’s a complete fabrication. 

Асимптоматикалык жугуу: кемчиликсиз жакшы адам деген түшүнүк респиратордук вирустун башка адамга коркунучун билдирет; болжол менен бир жыл мурун ойлоп табылган - бул тармакта буга чейин эч качан айтылган эмес ... Денедеги респиратордук вируска толуп, жугуштуу булакка айланганга чейин жана симптомдору жок болуп калбайт ... Адамдар деген чын эмес белгилери жок респиратордук вирустун коркунучу күчтүү. - 11-жылдын 2021-апрели, маектешүү Акыркы Америкалык Бомж

Дүйнөнүн атактуу иммунологдорунун бири мындай пикирге кошулат:

... кимдир бирөө эч кандай симптомсуз COVID-19 оорусун жуктуруп алышы мүмкүн, атүгүл эч кандай симптом көрсөтпөстөн ооруну жуктуруп алышы мүмкүн деп айтуу акылсыздыктын таажысы болгон. —Профессор Беда М.Штадлер, PhD, Швейцариянын Берн университетинин Иммунология институтунун мурдагы директору; Weltwoche (Дүйнөлүк жума) 10-июнь, 2020-жылы; cf. backtoreason.medium.com

This was confirmed in several papers,^[13]cf. Гейтске каршы иш including a massive study of nearly 10 million people published on November 20th, 2020 in Жаратылыш байланыштары:

Алты жаштан жогору жаштагы бардык шаар тургундары катыша алышты жана 9,899,828 92.9 1,174 (XNUMX%) катышты ... Симптоматикалык эмес учурларда болгон XNUMX жакын контакттардын арасында оң сыноолор болгон жок ... Вирустардын культуралары бардык симптомсуз позитивдүү жана репозитативдик учурларда терс болгон, бул “жашоо вирусу” жок экендигин көрсөткөн Бул изилдөөдө оң учурлар аныкталды. - "Кытайдын Ухань шаарынын он миллионго жакын жашоочусунда токтоп калгандан кийин SARS-CoV-2 нуклеин кислотасынын скрининги", Ши Цао, Йонг Ган ж.б. ал, nature.com

Thus, the response of governments flew entirely in the face of established science and pandemic preparedness measures that were already in place, says David Redman. He points to the WHO’s September 2019 guidance document compiled by the best infectious disease doctors in the world:  “Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza. «

Out of the 15 [non-pharmaceutical interventions listed in the document]—ones that we’ve come to know, closure of business, closure of schools, isolation of people that have been exposed — all three of those were strongly recommended against in a pandemic of this nature. Why? Because it was known from previous pandemics that those measures have no significant impact on the spread of a viral disease of the nature of COVID. —David Redman, August 2nd, 2021; theepochtimes.com

Quarantine of exposed individuals, entry and exit screening for infection in travellers, border closure, and contact tracing are among the six non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) listed in the WHO document that are жок recommended under кандайдыр circumstances, notes доору Times. 

To me it’s stunning that, as a public health scientist, we suddenly threw out these principles that we have sort of used for decades to deal with public health issues. —Dr. Martin Kulldorff , epidemiologist and professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School; —August 10th, 2021, 5:24 mark, доору Times

4. MASKS STOP THE SPREAD OF THE VIRUS

One of the most controversial measures aside from lockdowns — which are estimated to have killed millions, in and of themselves, through delayed surgeries, suicides, drug overdoses, and starvation^[14]cf. Душман дарбазанын ичинде жана Мен ачка болгондо — is the mandating of masks. Hundreds of studies had already shown that masking is completely ineffective against influenza, much less a coronavirus, which is several times smaller in size.^[15]cf. Фактыларды ачуу In fact, long after governments, businesses, and the media claimed that masks worked — without any evidence — the World Health Organization continually published statements to the opposite, including this one on December 1st, 2020:

Учурда респиратордук вирустардын, анын ичинде SARS-CoV-2нин алдын алуу үчүн дени сак адамдарды маскировкалоонун эффективдүүлүгүн колдоо үчүн чектелген жана дал келбеген илимий далилдер бар. -"COVID-19 шартында масканы колдонуу", apps.who.int

This has been confirmed by numerous new studies and a mountain of statistical data that the media and the CDC completely ignores.^[16]cf. Фактыларды ачуу That’s because nothing has changed regarding the very physics of the virus. Dr. Colin Axon, who advises the United Kingdom’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), stated recently:

Кичинекей өлчөмдөрдү оңой эле түшүнө беришпейт, бирок кемчиликсиз бир окшоштук мраморлорду куруучулардын курган тепкичтерине аткылап, кээ бирлери устунга урунуп, кайра жанданып калышы мүмкүн деп ойлошу мүмкүн, бирок алардын көпчүлүгү учуп өтөт ... Ковид вирус бөлүкчөсү 100 нанометрге жакын, көк түстөгү материалдык боштуктар хирургиялык маскалар 1,000 эсеге чейин, кездемеден жасалган маскадагы боштуктар 500,000 эсе чоңураак болушу мүмкүн ... Ковидди көтөрүп жүргөндөрдүн бардыгы эле жөтөлбөйт, бирок алар дем алып жатышат, аэрозолдор маскалардан качып, натыйжасыз болуп калышат. - Улуу Британия Өкмөтүнүн SAGE кеңешчиси, 17-июль, 2021-жыл; Telegraph

In fact, one of the science advisors to President Joe Biden also admitted recently:

Бүгүн биз билебиз, адамдар кийип жүргөн бет кездемелеринин көбү вирустун кыймылын азайтууда анча эффективдүү эмес, сиз дем алып жатасыз же дем алып жатасыз. - Др. Майкл Томас Остерхолм, 2 -август, 2021; CNN интервьюсу,: 41, rumble.com

While he recommends n95 masks, these too are shown to be ineffective and harmful to those who wear them for extended periods.^[17]cf. Фактыларды ачуу Masks are causing a lot of harm and potential long-term damage to children, leading many doctors and mask experts to declare them “child abuse.” This past April, a court in Weimar, Germany declared:

Мектеп окуучуларына беткап кийүүгө жана бири -биринен жана үчүнчү адамдардан алыс болууга мажбурлоо балдардын физикалык, психологиялык, тарбиялуу жана психо -социалдык өнүгүүсүнө зыян келтирет, бирок балдардын өздөрүнө эң жакшысынан көбүрөөк пайда алып келбейт. же үчүнчү жактарга. Мектептер "пандемия" иш-чарасында маанилүү роль ойнобойт ... Ар кандай типтеги бет маскалар SARS-CoV-2 жуктуруп алуу коркунучун такыр, атүгүл олуттуу түрдө төмөндөтө тургандыгы жөнүндө эч кандай далил жок. Бул билдирүү бардык курактагы адамдарга, анын ичинде балдарга жана өспүрүмдөргө, ошондой эле симптомсуз, симптомсуз жана симптоматикалык адамдарга тиешелүү. —14-апрель, 20201-жыл; 2020news.de; Англисче: jdfor2024.com 

Update: In September 2021, a алдын ала басып чыгаруу Массалык маалымат каражаттары Бангладештен келген жаңы рандомизацияланган көзөмөлдөнгөн изилдөөнүн маска талашын сөзсүз токтотууну талап кылышты. Бирок бир нече изилдөөчүлөр изилдөөнүн субъективдүү отчеттуулугун жана шектүү көзөмөлдөрүн тез эле белгилешти, анын ичинде айылдарга беткап кийүү, өзүн-өзү отчет берүү жана COVID толкундары кайда башталган же өтүп жаткандыгы жөнүндө маалыматтын жоктугу ж. Бир сынчы бүт методологияны "керексиз" жана "илим үчүн начар күн" деп атоого алып келди.^[18]cf. Бангладеш маскасын изилдөө: Хайпка ишенбегиле

For one of the most exhaustive articles with footnotes to the most recent studies on masking, see Фактыларды ачуу. 

5. SOCIAL DISTANCING

Arguably one of the most silly pandemic fables has been the requirement for people to stand anywhere from “three”, to “six”, to “ten or twelve feet” away from each other — depending on which “expert” you talk to. In truth, so-called “social distancing” is a complete fabrication in 2020 that ignores the science of how coronaviruses are spread. 

Early on in the epidemic, a story was invented to explain why this should work: The droplets that you breathe out are a certain size and it was claimed that if you were further than 2 meters away from the nearest person, it would allow that time for those droplets to sort of fall to earth, and you wouldn’t breathe them in and therefore wouldn’t catch the virus. This is almost only a made up story. [If you are infected], you are breathing out about 10 million virus particles күнүнө breath, nano-meter sized particles. So these particles get into the air and circulate around the air… —Dr. John Lee, NHS (National Health Service) pathologist in the UK, 28:52 in Илимдин артынан?

Indeed, an MIT study confirms that it doesn’t matter if you are 6 or 60 feet away from somebody, or whether you’re wearing a mask (as just explained). 

It really has no physical basis because the air a person is breathing while wearing a mask tends to rise and comes down elsewhere in the room so you’re more exposed to the average background than you are to a person at a distance… What our analysis continues to show is that many spaces that have been shut down in fact don’t need to be. Often times the space is large enough, the ventilation is good enough, the amount of time people spend together is such that those spaces can be safely operated even at full capacity and the scientific support for reduced capacity in those spaces is really not very good. I think if you run the numbers, even right now for many types of spaces you’d find that there is not a need for occupancy restrictions… The distancing isn’t helping you that much and it’s also giving you a false sense of security because you’re as safe at 6 feet as you are at 60 feet if you’re indoors. Everyone in that space is at roughly the same risk…  - Проф. Мартин З.Базант, 23-апрель, 2021-жыл, cnbc.com; Изилдөө: pnas.org

Hence, “social distancing” is even more ridiculous when mandated сыртында. 

If you look at the air flow outside, the infected air would be swept away and very unlikely to cause transmission. There are very few recorded instances of outdoor transmission.- Проф. Мартин З.Базант, 23-апрель, 2021-жыл, cnbc.com

6. THE “VACCINES” ARE “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE”

The first falsehood is actually labelling the mRNA injections promoted by Pfizer and Moderna as “vaccines.” According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States — and printed in black and white in Moderna’s own registration of their drug — is the statement:

Азыркы учурда, mRNA FDA тарабынан ген терапиясынын өнүмү болуп эсептелет. —Б. 19, sec.gov; (Moderna компаниясынын башкы директорунун технологияны жана алар "чындыгында жашоо программасын бузуп жаткандыгын" түшүндүрүп берүүсүн караңыз: TED баарлашуу)

There is nothing conventional about these. Over and over, the world is told on a daily basis that these injections are “safe and effective.” Not according to Dr. Peter McCullough MD, MPH who has worked on drug safety commissions and is the most highly cited scientist in the world in the National Library of Medicine. 

A typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained deaths, we get a black-box warning, your listeners would see it on TV, saying it may cause death. And then at about 50 deaths, it’s pulled off the market. —Dr. Peter McCullough, interview with Alex Newman, transcript: assets-global.website

Indeed, during the 1976 Swine Flue pandemic, the U.S. attempted to vaccinate 55 millions Americans, but the shot caused some 500 cases of paralysis and 25 deaths. 

The program was killed, at 25 deaths. —Ibid; assets-global.website

With these inoculations, however, the official reporting site in the United States (VAERS) has reported over 13,068 deaths and 17,228 permanent disabilities post-injection (697,564 adverse reactions excluding deaths). In Europe (EudraVigilance), over 21,766 are dead with 2,074,410 reported injuries (for links to the official databases, see Акылар). 

We have independent evaluations suggesting 86% [of deaths in the U.S. — 13,068 as of this writing] is related to the vaccine [and] is far beyond anything that is acceptable… It’s going to go down in history as the most dangerous biological-medicinal product rollout in human history. - Др. Питер МакКаллоу, 21 -июль, 2021, Stew Peters Show, rumble.com 17 боюнча: 38

Finally, few in the public seem to realize that the клиникалык сыноолор are still ongoing making those who are inoculated a part of what scientists are calling the “largest human experiment in history”, ошондой эле ырастады by Moderna.

Facebook is notorious for their false banners declaring the “vaccines” as safe. On the contrary, the long term trials of these COVID shots were waived and the injections were authorized for “emergency use” by governments, even before клиникалык сыноолор had been completed or peer-reviewed, and thus the long term side effects are unknown. It is precisely these concerns that renowned scientists all over the world have raised — and Facebook has frequently censored. Hear their warnings in the documentary Илимдин артынан? and hear/see actual testimonies of injuries, etc. at the uncensored MeWe Group: “COVID Vaccine Adverse Reactions Testimonies. One such recent testimony was relayed to me by a man whose brother is a cab driver. “He cannot divulge info BUT… he has nurses that tell him NOT to get the vax as he would not believe what it is doing to people, especially the elderly” (see бул отчет from Australia claiming a coverup of vax deaths and injuries). 

The real concern voiced by immunologists and virologists around the world, including the award winning Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, is what will happen a year or two from now to those who took this gene therapy.

Авто-кол салуу болот ... Авто-иммундук реакциялардын үрөнүн отургузасыз. Мен сага Рождество майрамы үчүн айтам, мындай кылба. Урматтуу Лорд адамдардын, атүгүл [доктор] Фаучинин, денеге бөтөн гендерди сайып келүүсүн каалабады ... бул үрөй учурган, үрөй учурган нерсе. -Highwire, 17-декабрь, 2020-жыл

7. THE mRNA INJECTIONS PROVIDE “HERD IMMUNITY”

The mRNA injections were never tested as to whether they would stop transmission of the virus. Rather, they were developed to reduce symptoms as a gene therapy. 

Изилдөөлөр [mRNA эмдөөлөрү] берүүнү баалоо үчүн иштелип чыккан эмес. Алар бул суроону беришпейт жана учурда бул боюнча эч кандай маалымат жок. - Др. Ларри Кори Улуттук Саламаттыкты сактоо Институтунун (NIH) COVID-19 "вакцина" сыноолорун көзөмөлдөйт; 20 -ноябрь, 2020 -жыл; medscape.com; cf. Primarydoctor.org/covidvaccine

Алар оор илдеттин жыйынтыгы менен текшерилген - жугуштуу оорунун алдын алышкан эмес. - АКШ хирургу генерал Жером Адамс, Good Morning Америка, 14-декабрь, 2020-жыл; dailymail.co.uk

Indeed, so-called “breakthrough cases” among the vaccinated are no surprise to doctors who understand the nature of these injections. In Israel, which claims vaccination rates over 62% of the populace, it is being reported by Dr. Kobi Haviv, the medical director of Herzog hospital, the third largest in Israel, that “95% of the severe patients are vaccinated” and that “85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people.”^[19]sarahwestall.com; карагыла. Акылар Саламаттыкты сактоо министрлигинин маалыматтары "эмделген израилдиктер табигый инфекцияга караганда ок тийгенден кийин 6.72 эсе көп жуккан".^[20]israelnationnews.com Улуу Британияда өлүмдүн деңгээли эмделгендердин арасында 6.6 эсе жогору,^[21].0.636% га салыштырмалуу 0957% а ылайык, жаңы отчет, suggesting that the injections are ruining recipient’s immune systems, as was warned. I have personally contacted a nurse in Edmonton, Alberta who said the ICU during a recent peak involved many who were “vaccinated”. I have heard this story repeated anecdotally throughout the world, mostly from nurses and doctors usually too afraid to speak publicly for fear of losing their jobs. For example….

Ковид-19 деп аталган вакцина такыр вакцина эмес. Бул кооптуу, эксперименталдык ген терапиясы. Ооруларды көзөмөлдөө борбору, CDC, ага вакцина термининин аныктамасын берет сайты. Вакцина - бул адамдын белгилүү бир ооруга каршы иммунитетин жаратуучу иммундук системасын стимулдай турган продукт. Иммунитет - бул жугуштуу оорудан сактоо. Эгерде сизде кандайдыр бир илдетке каршы иммунитет болсо, анда аны жуктурбай эле кабылсаңыз болот. Бул Covid-19 вакцинасы деп аталган вакцина алган бир дагы адамга Covid-19га каршы иммунитет берилбейт. Ошондой эле оорунун жайылышына жол бербейт. —Др. Стивен Хотзе, MD, 26-февраль, 2021-жыл; hotzehwc.com

Recently, Sarah Westall reported that attorney Tom Renz, who is suing the CDC & DHHS and others on behalf of America’s Frontline Doctors, stated that he is hearing from doctors all over the United States that their ICUs are filling up with most vaccinated patients:

I got an email from an ICU doctor whose hospital was going to try and make her take the vaccine, and this person says ‘In my ICU, 31 of the 34 patients for COVID, because there is 34 there, 31 of them are vaccinated and are actually having vaccine reactions, it’s not COVID.’ And she said, ‘I don’t want to take this vaccine, what can I do?’… This is something I get all over the country. This is an outright lie, and we know it’s a lie.” -sarahwestall.com

So why do the media and TV health pundits continue to speak of herd immunity as if it can be achieved with these particular injections when they are doing the opposite? And yet, we hear claims now that some ICU’s in Texas and Louisiana are apparently seeing more unvaccinated than not. Even if that is the case — and already the media has been caught exaggerating once again — to blame the unvaccinated is wrong-headed. I’ll address that in No. 8.

South Florida nurse shares her firsthand ICU experience…

8. EVERYONE IS IN DANGER FROM COVID-19

This reminds me of the AIDs campaigns in the 1990’s where billboards and television ads warned that everyone was at risk of getting AIDs and, therefore, ought to use condoms. In truth, if you stayed faithful to your spouse or remained chaste before marriage, or did not require a blood transfusion, there was essentially zero risk. 

So too with COVID-19, the media loved to terrorize their audience with the extremely rare cases where someone young dies from the disease suggesting, therefore, that everyone is at high risk. In truth, the danger is markedly different for those who are much older. The prestigious жаратылыш journal reported: 

For every 1,000 people infected with the coronavirus who are under the age of 50, almost none will die. For people in their fifties and early sixties, about five will die — more men than women. The risk then climbs steeply as the years accrue. For every 1,000 people in their mid-seventies or older who are infected, around 116 will die. — August 28th, 2020; nature.com

Not unlike seasonal influenza, which can kill up to 600,000 globally each year, COVID-19 is also particularly hard on the aged with pre-existing health conditions.^[22]cebm.net The U.S. Centers for Disease Controls’ (CDC) reported that only 5% of the total death count had COVID-19 listed as “the only cause mentioned on the death certificate.”^[23]cdc.gov The remaining 95% mortalities had an average of 2.6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that contributed to their deaths. In other words, with rare exceptions, COVID-19 is at most a nasty flu for the majority of the population with a high survival rate over 99.7%.^[24]cdc.gov

Dr. Martin Kulldorff is an epidemiologist and professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. He calls the global COVID response that locked down healthy, low risk individuals as the “biggest public health fiasco in history.” 

While anybody can get infected by COVID, there’s more than thousand fold difference in the risk for death in the mortality rates for the oldest and the youngest… The risk from COVID for children is less than the risk from annual influenza, which is already low for children. —August 10th, 2021, доору Times

Which is why insisting on injecting children with an experimental vaccine is rightly considered child abuse and a violation of the Nuremburg Code, which forbids involuntary medical experimentation on anyone.

Medical censorship is the greatest danger to truth for health that I have seen in my career. This is especially true when we have critical information on deaths and escalating medical risks with these experimental COVID shots that we have a duty to release to the public to save lives. -Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, President and Chief Executive Officer of Truth for Health, August 4th, 2021; stoptheshot.com

9. THE UNVACCINATED ARE THE THREAT

This is perhaps the most dangerous and unsubstantiated lie in the media, which is fomenting a true medical apartheid. Mandatory vaccines and “vaccine passports” are now instruments being used to demonize those who refuse to become part of this experiment, or who already have natural immunity. Dr. Peter McCullough stated before a Сенат комитетинин угуусу Техас 80% "бодо иммунитетине" ээ болгон мурун эмдөө кампаниясы башталды. 

Табигый иммунитетти жеңе албайсыз. Анын үстүнө эмдеп, жакшырта албайсың. - Др. Питер МакКаллоу, 10 -март, 2021; cf. даректүү Илимдин артынан?

MIT's Technology Review reported a new study showing that “Covid-19 patients who recovered from the disease still have robust immunity from the coronavirus eight months after infection”^[25]6-январь, 2021-жыл; Technologyreview.com жана жаратылыш жарыяланган окуу 2021-жылдын май айынын аягында "Жумшак COVID-19дан айыгып кеткен адамдардын ондогон жылдар бою антителолорду жок кыла турган жилик чучугу клеткалары бар экенин" көрсөтүп турат.^[26]26-май, 2021-жыл; nature.com

Эмнегедир, адамдар азыркы учурдагы абалдан ырахат алып жатканыбыздын бир себеби, "үйүрдүн иммунитети" олуттуу түрдө калыптангандыгынан баш тартышууда. - Др. Сунетра Гупта, Оксфорддун эпидемиологу Илимдин артынан?

The argument presented by obedient news anchors is that the unvaccinated will cause “variants” that will somehow evade the “vaccines.” However, there are дайыма variants with any coronavirus and that will continue to be the case with SARS-CoV-2 for decades to come, state epidemiologists. The idea that one can completely eradicate such a virus has no basis in science. While variants are more contagious, says Dr. Mike Yeadon, they tend to be less harmful and so close in nature to the original virus, that one remains immune once infected: 

Вирусту жуктуруп алгандан кийин, иммунитетке ээ болосуз. Бул тууралуу эч кандай белгисиздик жок. Бул азыр жүздөгөн жолу изилденди, көптөгөн адабияттар басылып чыкты. Ошентип, сиз жуктуруп алгандан кийин, көп учурда сизде эч кандай симптомдор болбойт, балким ондогон жылдар бою иммунитетке ээ болосуз. Доктор Майк Йидон, cf. 34:05, Илимдин артынан?

Dr. Kulldorff states:

It’s not surprising that you have variants, and that you some variants sort of take over, so this is not at all surprising. The “Delta variant” might be somewhat more contagious, but that’s not a game-changer. What would be a game-changer is if you got a variant that started to kill young people, started to kill children, and the Delta variant is not doing that [in any statistically significant way]… What we know is that if you have had COVID, you have very good immunity — not only for the same variant, but also for other variants. And even for other types, cross-immunity, for other types of coronaviruses.- Др. Мартин Куллдорф, 10 -август, 2021, доору Times

However, there may be one exception to this.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM as well as Nobel Prize laureate Prof. Luc Montagnier warned that, vaccinating with this type of injection убагында a pandemic is a huge mistake and could force a more lethal variant. This has been a subject of debate among scientists. We published excerpts from Dr. Vanden Bossche’s Open Letter shortly after it was released in March 2021 (see Grave Warnings):

… Профилактикалык вакциналардын бул түрү вирустук пандемия учурунда массалык эмдөө кампанияларында колдонулганда, такыр ылайыксыз, ал тургай өтө кооптуу. Вакцинологдор, илимпоздор жана доктурлар айрым патенттердеги кыска мөөнөттүү оң натыйжаларга көзү жетпейт, бирок глобалдык ден-соолукка алып келүүчү кесепеттүү кесепеттери жөнүндө убара болушпайт. Эгерде менин илимий жактан туура эмес экеним далилденбесе, учурдагы адамдардын кийлигишүүсү кандагы варианттардын жапайы желмогузга айланышына кандайча тоскоол болоорун түшүнүү кыйын ... Негизинен, биз эң баалуу коргонуу механизмибизге толугу менен туруштук берген супер-жугуштуу вируска туш болобуз. : Адамдын иммундук системасы. Жогоруда айтылгандардын баарынан улам барган сайын көбөйүп баратат татаал кеңири жана жаңылыш адамдын кесепети кандай болорун элестетүү кийлигишүү бул пандемияда биздин адамдын көп бөлүгүн жок кылууга болбойт калктын саны. 

But as usual, he was censored and gagged by the media.  

While one can barely make any incorrect scientific statements without being criticized by peers, it seems like the elite of scientists who are currently advising our world leaders prefer to stay silent. Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table. Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity? We can hardly say we didn’t know—or were not warned.  -Ачык кат, 6-март, 2021-жыл; доктор Ванден Босше менен ушул эскертүү боюнча маектешүүнү көрүңүз бул жерде or бул жерде. (Доктор Ванден Босшенин заманбап "Моиши" экендигин окуңуз Биздин 1942)

Dr. Vanden Bossche may be in a conflict of interest since he is actively working on a more suitable vaccine, according to his Linkedin account. But Dr. Montagnier makes the same assertion:

Mass vaccinations are a “scientific error as well as a medical error,” he said. “It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.” —May 18th, 2021; interview with Pierre Barnérias, rairfoundation.com

In fact, a study in 2015 found that “imperfect vaccination can enhance the transmission of highly virulent pathogens.” ^[27]ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516275/ The current COVID-19 shots are the perfect example of such “leaky vaccines” since they do not stop the transmission of the virus but only reduce symptoms (while also causing the most unprecedented adverse reactions ever recorded in the history of a vaccine campaign). Hence, it is no surprise that we have seen reports^[28]мис. бул жерде жана бул жерде деп эмдоодон who are driving new outbreaks initially at the very same time that the mass vaccination has been rolled out. Indeed, a groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published August 10th, 2021 in Lancet, “found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.”^[29]childrenshealthdefense.org

Yet, with one harmonious voice, the CDC and American media began to proclaim in mid-July that we are in a “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated”. ^[30]New York Times July 16th, 2021 However, that new mantra, which is leading to a persecution of the unvaccinated unlike anything we’ve ever seen, is another “sleight of hand” abusing the truth:

As it turns out, to achieve those statistics, the CDC included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021. It does not include more recent data or data related to the Delta variant, which is now the most prevalent strain in circulation. The problem is, the vast majority of the United States population was unvaccinated during that timeframe. January 1, 2021, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots,^[31]bloomberg.com and as of June 15, 48.7% were fully “vaccinated.”^[32]mayoclinic.com Keep in mind that you’re not “fully vaccinated” until two weeks after your second dose (in the case of Pfizer or Moderna), which is given six weeks after your first shot. This is according to the CDC.^[33]cdc.gov —Dr. Joseph Mercola, August 16th, 2021, mercola.com

Canadian viral immunologist and vaccine researcher Dr. Byram Bridle, who revealed data earlier this year that the toxic “spike protein” in these mRNA “vaccines” accumulates throughout the body, especially the ovaries ^[34]cf. Илимдин артынан?  — shot down the claim that ‘we’re in a pandemic of the unvaxxed, and that the unvaccinated are hotbeds for dangerous variants’:

Absolutely, it’s untrue to be calling this a pandemic of the unvaccinated. And it’s certainly untrue… that the unvaccinated are somehow driving the emergence of the novel variants. This goes against every scientific principle that we understand.

The reality is, the nature of the vaccines we are using right now, and the way we’re rolling them out, are going to be applying selective pressure to this virus to promote the emergence of new variants. Again, this is based on sound principles. —August 16th, 2021, mercola.com

In other words, it is the current vaccine campaign and the “vaccinated” — not the unvaccinated — which appears to have created the emerging situation. The evolutionary genetics theory, Muller’s Ratchet, states that as an outbreak starts to peter out, the virus tends to mutate into a more transmissible form, but at the same time it grows weaker. Dr. McCullough presents other data suggesting the Delta Variant is consistent with that theory.

The good news is on the 18th of June, the United Kingdom presented their 16th report ^[35]активдер.публикациялоо.кызмат.gov.uk  on the mutations — and they’re doing a great job, much better than our CDC — and what they demonstrated is that the Delta is more contagious but it’s far less deadly, far less worrisome. In fact, it’s a much weaker virus than both the U.K. [Alpha] and the South African [Beta] variants. —Dr. Peter McCullough, June 22, 2021; The Laura Ingraham Show, youtube.com

Under either scenario, the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” in this context is a fable.

• August 1, 2021, director of Israel’s Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, announced half of all COVID-19 infections were among the fully vaccinated.^[36]bloomberg.com Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated are also emerging, she said, particularly in those over the age of 60.

A few days later, August 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely ill COVID-19 patients are fully vaccinated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID-related hospitalizations overall.^[37]americanfaith.com As of August 2, 2021, 66.9% of Israelis had received at least one dose of Pfizer’s injection, which is used exclusively in Israel; 62.2% had received two doses.^[38]ourworldindata.com

• In Scotland, official data on hospitalizations and deaths show 87% of those who have died from COVID-19 in the third wave that began in early July were vaccinated.^[39]dailyexpose.co.uk

• A CDC investigation of an outbreak in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, between July 6 through July 25, 2021, found 74% of those who received a diagnosis of COVID19, and 80% of hospitalizations, were among the fully vaccinated.^[40]cdc.gov; cnbc.com Most, but not all, had the Delta variant of the virus.

The CDC also found that fully vaccinated individuals who contract the infection have as high a viral load in their nasal passages as unvaccinated individuals who get infected.²² This means the vaccinated are just as infectious as the unvaccinated.

• In Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID jab compliance rate, COVID cases have risen by 2,500% since June 1, 2021.^[41]bigleaguepolitics.com

10. THERE IS NO HOPE OUTSIDE MASS VACCINATION

Perhaps one of the biggest lies is that we are helpless — that mankind is going to be wiped out by this disease unless we all rush to not only be injected by an experimental gene therapy with unknown long term effects, but that we will require future booster shots, perhaps indefinitely. Big Pharma’s dream and long game has been to turn the world into vaccine junkies with trillions of dollars in profits at stake.^[42]cf. Гейтске каршы иш

On the contrary, it is well documented that both hydroxychloroquine жана Ивермектин have huge success rates in the treatment of COVID-19 — no matter what the media tells you. In fact, the бир изилдөө in Lancet ошол put Hydroxychloroquine in a bad light had to be жоюлду — a fraudulent “fake paper”, stated several observers.^[43]cf. Илимдин артынан? On the other hand, a new study shows that there are 84% fewer hospitalizations for those treated with a “low-dose hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc and azithromycin.”^[44]25-ноябрь, 2020-жыл; Washington сыноочу, cf. алдын-ала: scomachirect.com Азыр Д витамини коронавирус коркунучун 54% га төмөндөтөт.^[45]bostonherald.com; Сентябрь 17th, 2020 изилдөө: journals.plos.org And the evidence for Ivermectin, used successfully in several countries, is that it is a near miracle drug: cheap, safe, and effective. 

Дүйнөнүн көптөгөн борборлорунан жана өлкөлөрүнөн тоолор пайда болуп, Ивермектиндин керемет натыйжалуулугун көрсөтүштү. Бул вирустун таралышын негизинен жок кылат. Алсаңыз, оорубайсыз. —Dr. Pierre Kory, Senate December 8th, 2020; cnsnews.com

A real-time meta-analyses of 99 studies on Ivermectin show as high as a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis].^[46]ivermeta.com So if someone says to you, “Oh, my ICU is full of COVID patients right now.” Your response should be, “It’s too bad they’re being deprived of Ivermectin, etc.”. Dr. Vladimir Zelenko has successfully treated thousands of COVID-19 patients with this: prophylaxis protocol жана иштетүү. You can hear Dr. Zelenko discuss this, along with serious warnings of ignoring these protocols, бул жерде. 

In fact, in one of the more breathtaking moments in this whole pandemic response, leading vaccine developer, Pfizer, published a tweet saying that, actually, an antiviral treatment (which is what Ivermectin is) will be necessary after all to be successful against COVID-19. The irony in this is stunning — only overshadowed by the fact that, lo and behold, Pfizer has just the drug now in trials. But there you have it in black and white: the “vaccine” doesn’t work as advertised, and the very treatments that have been viciously censored will be necessary. Of course, just not ошол дарылоо.

The mainstream and social media’s censorship of these truths is the biggest sign that you are in the midst of a mass propaganda campaign on behalf of some of the most powerful “health” brokers in the world. If they really cared, they’d simply let you hear the facts and let doctors do what they’ve always done: prescribe what is most suitable to the situation. In fact, the obsession with injecting everyone, including babies — and making this mandatory — has created more damage to the trust in both government and medical institutions than anything else in recent memory. 

Those who are pushing these vaccine mandates and vaccine passports — vaccine фанаттар, I would call them — to me, they have done much more damage during this year than anti-vaxxers have done in two decades.—Dr. Martin Kulldorff, August 10th, 2021, 0:00 mark доору Times

In and of itself, fear must NEVER be used as a tool in response. If it is, it will have uncontrollable, long term, severe, unpredictable collateral damage. —David Redman, July 2021, “Canada’s Deadly Response to COVID-19“, pg. 37

Without solid science, fear, unfortunately, is the only tool left to the compromised mainstream and social media giants. And sadly, it’s working with “unpredictable” and potentially horrific consequences once this experiment is done…

OK, ONE LAST FABLE: COVID IS OUR ONLY PROBLEM

You’d think so, given the daily news reports by the minute and hour for over a year and a half now. But ignoring all the other health issues with the single goal that “ALL MUST BE VACCINATED” is as dangerous as it is bizarre. 

Public Health is about all health outcomes. It’s not just about one disease like COVID. You can’t just focus on COVID and ignore everything else. —Dr. Martin Kulldorff, August 10th, 2021, 5:40 mark доору Times

In one of the most powerful and balanced statements from a clergyman, French Bishop Marc Aillet warned that the myopic approach to health by government officials is leading to a social disaster.

In 2018 there were 157000 deaths in France due to cancer! It took a long time to talk about the inhuman treatment that was imposed in care homes on the elderly, who were shut in, sometimes locked in their rooms, with family visits being prohibited. There are many testimonies concerning the psychological disturbance and even the premature death of our elders. Little is said about the significant increase in depression among individuals who were unprepared. Psychiatric hospitals are overloaded here and there, pyschologists’ waiting-rooms are crowded, a sign that French mental health is worsening – a cause for concern, as the Health Minister has just publicly acknowledged. There have been denunciations of the risk of “social euthanasia”, given estimations that 4 million of our fellow citizens find themselves in situations of extreme loneliness, not to mention the additional million in France who, since the first confinement, have fallen below the poverty threshold. And what about small businesses, the suffocation of small traders who will be forced to file for bankruptcy? …man is “one in body and soul”, it is not right to turn physical health into an absolute value to the point of sacrificing the psychological and spiritual health of citizens, and in particular to deprive them of freely practicing their religion, which experience proves to be essential for their equilibrium. 

Коркуу жакшы кеңешчи эмес: бул туура эмес мамилеге алып келет, адамдарды бири-бирине каршы коёт, чыңалуунун, атүгүл зомбулуктун кырдаалын жаратат. Жардыруунун алдында турганыбыз жакшы! - епископ Марк Аилле епархия журналы үчүн Нотр Эглиз ("Биздин чиркөө"), декабрь 2020; countdowntothekingdom.com

Setting aside all the serious controversies of how COVID deaths have been determined and calculated — a fable in itself^[47]cf. Илимдин артынан? — John Hopkins University claims that there are over 4.9 million global deaths from COVID-19. Compare that now to the potential deaths and destruction that lockdowns themselves have and will create:

Төмөнкүлөрдү угуңуз:

Маркты жана MeWeде күн сайын "мезгил белгилерин" ээрчип жүрүңүз:

Марктын жазгандарын бул жерден караңыз:

Марк менен саякатка The Азыр Word,
үчүн төмөнкү баннерди чыкылдатыңыз жазылуу.
Электрондук почтаңыз эч ким менен бөлүшүлбөйт.