Puzzlery Papali

 

Risposta komprensiva għal bosta mistoqsijiet mexxiet triqti rigward il-pontifikat taqlib tal-Papa Franġisku. Niskuża ruħi li dan huwa kemmxejn itwal mis-soltu. Iżda b'xorti tajba, qed twieġeb diversi mistoqsijiet tal-qarrejja ....

 

MINN qarrej:

Nitlob għall-konverżjoni u għall-intenzjonijiet tal-Papa Franġisku kuljum. Jiena wieħed li inizjalment inħabbt mal-Missier Imqaddes meta ġie elett għall-ewwel darba, iżda matul is-snin tal-Pontifikat tiegħu, ħawwadni u għamilni mħasseb ħafna li l-ispiritwalità liberali tiegħu tal-Ġiżwiti kienet kważi qajjem il-wiżż bil-weraq tax-xellug. viżjoni tad-dinja u ż-żminijiet liberali. Jien Franġiskan Sekulari allura l-professjoni tiegħi torbotni għall-ubbidjenza tiegħu. Imma rrid nammetti li jbeżżagħni ... Kif nafu li mhuwiex anti-papa? Il-midja qed idawwar kliemu? Għandna nsegwu bl-addoċċ u nitolbu għalih aktar? Dan huwa dak li kont qed nagħmel, imma qalbi hija konfliġġenti.

 
FEAR AND CONFUSION 
 
That the Pope has left a trail of confusion is undeniable. It has become one of the main themes discussed in nearly every Catholic media outlet from EWTN to regional publications. As one commentator said a few years ago: 
Benedittu XVI intimida lill-midja għax kliemu kienu bħal kristall brillanti. Kliem is-suċċessur tiegħu, mhux essenzjalment differenti minn dak ta ’Benedittu, huma bħal ċpar. Iktar ma jipproduċi kummenti spontanjament, aktar jirriskja li jagħmel lid-dixxipli fidili tiegħu jidhru bħall-irġiel bil-pali li jsegwu l-iljunfanti fiċ-ċirku. 
But should this “scare” us? If the fate of the Church rests upon a single man, then yes, it would be alarming. But it doesn’t. Rather, it is Jesus, not Peter, who is building His Church. What methods and materials the Lord chooses to use are His business.[1]cf. Ġesù, il-Bennej Għaref But we already know that the Lord often uses the weak, the proud, the flippant… in a word, Peter
And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. (Matthew 16:18)
To be certain, every scandal in the Church is like another threatening wave; every heresy and error that presents itself is like a rocky shoal or shallow sandbar upon which the Barque of Peter risks running aground. Recall the observation Cardinal Ratzinger made several years before the world learned who Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio (Pope Francis) was:
Lord, Your Church often seems like a boat about to sink, a boat taking in water on every side. —Kardinal Ratzinger, 24 ta 'Marzu, 2005, Meditazzjoni tal-Ġimgħa l-Kbira fit-Tielet Fall ta ’Kristu
Iva, dan Jidher that way. But Christ promises that hell will mhux “prevail” against it. That is, the Barque may be damaged, thwarted, delayed, misguided, listing, or taking on water; her captain and first officers may be asleep, lukewarm, or distracted. But she will never sink. That’s Christ’s wegħda. [2]cf. Ġesù, il-Bennej Għaref In a dream of the Barque of Peter, St. John Bosco recounts:
At times, a formidable ram splinters a gaping hole in its hull, but immediately, a breeze from the two columns [of the Virgin and the Eucharist] instantly seals the gash.  -Profezija Kattolika, Sean Patrick Bloomfield, P.58
Confused? Sure. Scared? No. We should be in the space of faith. 
“Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?” He woke up, rebuked the wind, and said to the sea, “Quiet! Be still!”. The wind ceased and there was great calm. Then he asked them, “Why are you terrified? Do you not yet have faith?” (Mark 4:37-40)
 
LEFT-LEANING?
 
You suggest that the Pope is “left-leaning.” It’s worth recalling that the Pharisees also thought Jesus was heterodox for the same reasons many oppose Francis. Why? Because Christ pushed mercy to its limits (see L-Iskandlu tal-Ħniena). Pope Francis likewise offends many “conservatives” for seemingly snubbing the letter of the law. And one can almost pinpoint the day that began…
 
It was in an interview that appeared in Magazine Amerika, a Jesuit publication. There, the new Pope shared his vision:
Il-ministeru pastorali tal-Knisja ma jistax ikun ossessjonat bit-trażmissjoni ta ’għadd kbir ta’ duttrini diskonnessi li għandhom jiġu imposti b’mod insistenti. Il-proklamazzjoni fi stil missjunarju tiffoka fuq l-essenzjali, fuq l-affarijiet meħtieġa: dan huwa wkoll dak li jaffaxxina u jattira aktar, dak li jġiegħel il-qalb tinħaraq, kif għamlet għad-dixxipli f'Emmaus. Irridu nsibu bilanċ ġdid; inkella, anke l-edifiċju morali tal-Knisja x'aktarx jaqa 'bħal dar tal-karti, u jitlef il-freskezza u l-fwieħa tal-Vanġelu. Il-proposta tal-Vanġelu trid tkun aktar sempliċi, profonda, radjanti. Huwa minn din il-proposta li mbagħad joħorġu l-konsegwenzi morali. —L-30 ta ’Settembru, 2013; americamagazine.org
Notably, several of those battling the “culture of death” on the front lines were immediately offended. They had assumed that the Pope would applaud them for boldly asserting the truth about abortion, defence of the family, and traditional marriage. Instead, they felt they were being scolded for being “obsessed” with these issues. 
 
But the Pope was not suggesting in any way that these cultural matters were not significant. Rather, that they are not the heart of the Church’s mission, particularly at this hour. He went on to explain:

I see clearly that the thing the church needs most today is the ability to heal wounds and to warm the hearts of the faithful; it needs nearness, proximity. I see the church as a field hospital after battle. It is useless to ask a seriously injured person if he has high cholesterol and about the level of his blood sugars! You have to heal his wounds. Then we can talk about everything else. Heal the wounds, heal the wounds…. And you have to start from the ground up. —Ibid. 

“No, no, no!” cried some. “We are still at gwerra, and we are losing! We must reassert the doctrines that are under attack! What is wrong with this Pope? Is he a liberal??”

But if I may be so bold, the problem with that response (which has nearly snowballed into a schism for some today) is that it reveals a heart that is not humbly listening or self-reflecting. The Pope did not say that doctrines were not important. Rather, he made a crucial observation about the culture wars: the orthodox teachings of the Church, firmly enunciated under St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI and widely known in the mainstream, have not pulled the world out its freefall into hedonistic paganism. That is, continuing to merely reassert doctrines isn’t working. What is needed, Francis insists, is a return to the “essentials”—what he would later call the kerygma. 

Fuq fomm il-katekista trid tinstema’ l-ewwel tħabbira: “Ġesù Kristu jħobbkom; ta ħajtu biex isalvak; u issa qed jgħix maġenbek kuljum biex idawwalkom, isaħħuk u jeħliskom.” Din l-ewwel proklamazzjoni tissejjaħ “l-ewwel” mhux għax teżisti fil-bidu u mbagħad tista’ tintesa jew tiġi mibdula b’affarijiet oħra aktar importanti. Hija l-ewwel f’sens kwalitattiv għax hija t-tħabbira prinċipali, dik li rridu nisimgħu għal darb’oħra b’modi differenti, dik li rridu nħabbru b’xi mod jew ieħor tul il-proċess tal-katekeżi, f’kull livell u mument. -Evangelii Gaudiumle. 164

You have to heal the wounds first. You have to stop the bleeding, the hopeless bleeding… “and then we can talk about everything else.” From this “more simple, profound and radiant” proclamation of the Good News, “then the moral consequences,” the doctrines, dogmas and liberating moral truths flow. Where, I ask, is Pope Francis suggesting that truth is no longer relevant or necessary? 
 
While not central to his pontificate in the way it was for his predecessors, Francis has on many occasions reasserted the dignity of life, the fallacies of “gender ideology,” the sanctity of marriage, and the moral teachings of the Catechism. He has also warned the faithful against laziness, complacency, unfaithfulness, gossiping, and consumerism—such as in his latest Apostolic Exhortation:
L-Edoniżmu u l-konsumiżmu jistgħu jippruvaw il-waqgħa tagħna, għax meta nkunu ossessjonati bil-pjaċir tagħna stess, nispiċċaw inħassbu wisq dwarna nfusna u d-drittijiet tagħna, u nħossu ħtieġa ddisprata għal ħin liberu biex ingawdu lilna nfusna. Se nsibuha diffiċli biex inħossu u nuru xi tħassib reali għal dawk fil-bżonn, sakemm ma nkunux kapaċi nikkultivaw ċerta sempliċità tal-ħajja, nirreżistu t-talbiet deni ta 'soċjetà tal-konsumatur, li jħalluna fqar u mhux sodisfatti, anzjużi li jkollna kollox issa. -Gaudete et Exultate, n. 108; vatikan.va
All that said, the Pope has no doubt made some decisions that may justify some head-scratching if not alarm: the contradictory and ambiguous language of Amoris Laetitia; the refusal to meet with certain Cardinals; the silence over the “dubia”; the transfer of authority over bishops to the Chinese government; explicit support for the questionable and controversial science of “global warming”; the seemingly inconsistent approach to clerical sex-offenders; the ongoing Vatican Bank controversies; the admittance of population control advocates to Vatican conferences, and so forth. These may not only come across as “goose-stepping” with the “liberal times” but seemingly play into the globalist’s agenda—as well as some dramatic papal prophecies, which I’ll address in a few moments. The point is that popes can and do make mistakes in their governance and relationships, which can leave us repeating:
“Teacher, do you not care that we are perishing?”… Then he asked them, “Why are you terrified? Do you not yet have faith?” (Mark 4:37-40)  
To answer your other question on whether the media “twists” his words, there is no doubt about that. For example, remember the “Who am I to judge?” fiasco? Well, even some of the Catholic media brutally messed that up with unfortunate consequences (see Min Jien biex Imħallef? u, Min Int biex Tiġġudika?).
 
 
BLIND OBEDIENCE?
 
There is no necessity for “blind obedience” in the Catholic Church. Why? Because the truths revealed by Jesus Christ, taught to the Apostles, and faithfully handed on by their successors, are not hidden. Moreover, they are gloriously logical. I was introduced to a former militant atheist who recently became a Catholic solely because of the intellectual rationale of Church teachings and the radiant sheen of truth. He added, “The experiential is now following.” Moreover, with internet search engines and the Katekiżmu tal-Knisja Kattolika, the entire body of Church teaching is entirely accessible.  
 
And neither is this Tradition subject to the personal whims of the Pope “despite enjoying ‘supreme, full, immediate and universal ordinary power in the Church’.” [3]cf. POPE FRANCIS, closing remarks on the Synod; Aġenzija tal-Aħbarijiet Kattoliċi, It-18 ta ’Ottubru, 2014
Il-Papa mhuwiex sovran assolut, li l-ħsibijiet u x-xewqat tiegħu huma liġi. Għall-kuntrarju, il-ministeru tal-papa huwa l-garanti tal-ubbidjenza lejn Kristu u l-kelma tiegħu. —PAPA BENEDIKTU XVI, Omelija tat-8 ta ’Mejju, 2005; San Diego Union-Tribune
Dan jingħad kollox Il-Papat Mhux Papa WieħedPeter speaks with vuċi waħda, and therefore, cannot contradict himself in the teachings of his predecessors, which come from Christ himself. We proceed anything iżda blind, guided as we are by the Spirit of truth who will…
...guide you to all truth. (John 16:13)
Your response is the right one when the Pope ma seem to be contradicting his predecessors: to pray for him all the more. But it must be said emphatically; even though Pope Francis has been ambiguous at times, he has not changed a single letter of doctrine, even if he has muddied the waters of pastoral practice. But if that is indeed the case, there is a precedent for when such circumstances occur:
And when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face because he clearly was wrong… I saw that they were not on the right road in line with the truth of the gospel. (Gal 2:11-14)
Perhaps another problematic issue is coming to light: an unhealthy kult tal-personalità that has surrounded the Pope where there really is a kind of “blind” adherence. Several decades of theologically precise popes and the ready access to kollha their statements have created a certain false assumption in some faithful that almost everything a pope utters is, therefore, pure gold. That’s simply not the case. A pope can most certainly be wrong when he pronounces on matters outside of “faith and morals,” such as science, medicine, sports, or the weather forecast. 
Il-Papiet għamlu u jagħmlu żbalji u din mhix sorpriża. L-infallibilità hija riservata ex cathedra ["Mis-sede" ta 'Pietru, jiġifieri, proklamazzjonijiet ta' dogma bbażati fuq it-Tradizzjoni Sagra]. L-ebda papiet fl-istorja tal-Knisja qatt ma għamlu ex cathedra żbalji.—Rev. Joseph Iannuzzi, Teologu, f'ittra personali għalija
 
IS HE AN ANTIPOPE?
 
This question is likely getting to the heart of many concerns today, and it is a serious one. For there is presently a growing momentum among “ultra conservative” Catholics to find a reason to declare this papacy invalid.  
 
First, what is an antipope? By definition, it is anyone who unlawfully usurps the throne of Peter. In the case of Pope Francis, not a single Cardinal has even so much as aċċennata that the papal election of Jorge Bergoglio was invalid. By definition and canonical law, Francis is not an antipope. 
 
However, some Catholics are asserting that a little “mafia” forced Benedict XVI out of the papacy, and therefore, Francis is tabilħaqq an antipope. But as I noted in Barquing Up-Siġra Ħażinathe Emeritus Pope has categorically denied this on three occasions. 
That’s all complete nonsense. No, it’s actually a straightforward matter… no one has tried to blackmail me. If that had been attempted I would not have gone since you are not permitted to leave because you’re under pressure. It’s also not the case that I would have bartered or whatever. On the contrary, the moment had—thanks be to God—a sense of having overcome the difficulties and a mood of peace. A mood in which one really could confidently pass the reins over to the next person. — IL-BENEDITT TAL-POPA XVI, Benedittu XVI, l-Aħħar Testment fi kliemu stess, ma 'Peter Seewald; p. 24 (Pubblikazzjoni Bloomsbury)
In addition, some have carelessly misread several prophecies, such as this one from Our Lady of Good Success regarding a future pope:
He will be persecuted and imprisoned in the Vatican through the usurpation of the Pontifical States and through the malice, envy, and avarice of an earthly monarch. —Our Lady to Sr. Mariana de Jesus Torres; tfp.org
Again, there is an assumption that evil members within the Curia are holding Benedict XVI against his will within the walls of the Vatican, which again, he has refuted. 
 
And then there is the prophecy of “two popes” of Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich, which states:

I saw also the relationship between two popes … I saw how baleful would be the consequences of this false church. I saw it increase in size; heretics of every kind came into the city of Rome. The local clergy grew lukewarm, and I saw a great darkness… I had another vision of the great tribulation. It seems to me that a concession was demanded from the clergy which could not be granted. I saw many older priests, especially one, who wept bitterly. A few younger ones were also weeping. But others, and the lukewarm among them, readily did what was demanded. It was as if people were splitting into two camps.

Aha! Two popes! Couldn’t the “concession” be that Communion to the divorced and remarried is being permitted now by some bishops through a flawed interpretation of Amoris Laetitia? The problem is that the proper context of the “relationship” between the two popes is not a personal or proximate one, as one editorialist has pointed out:
…“the two popes” was not a relationship between two contemporaries, but two historical bookends, as it were, held apart by centuries: the pope who Christianized the most notable symbol of the pagan world, and the pope who would subsequently paganize the Catholic Church, thus reversing his sainted predecessor’s gains. —Steve Skojec, May 25th, 2016; onepeterfive.com
Another prominent prophecy invoked against Pope Francis today is that of his namesake—St. Francis of Assisi. That Saint once predicted:

The time is fast approaching in which there will be great trials and afflictions; perplexities and dissensions, both spiritual and temporal, will abound; the charity of many will grow cold, and the malice of the wicked will increase. The devils will have unusual power, the immaculate purity of our Order, and of others, will be so much obscured that there will be very few Christians who will obey the true Sovereign Pontiff and the Roman Catholic Church with loyal hearts and perfect charity. At the time of this tribulation a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his cunning, will endeavor to draw many into error and death…. Sanctity of life will be held in derision, even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor, but a destroyer. —Works of the Seraphic Father by R. Washbourne (1882), p.250 

The problem with applying this to our present pope is that the “destroyer” here is “not canonically elected.” This, therefore, cannot refer to Pope Francis. But his successor…?
 
And then there is the prophecy from La Salette, France:

Ruma titlef il-fidi u ssir is-sede tal-Antikrist. —seer, Melanie Calvat

Il “Rome will lose the faith” mean that the Catholic Church will lose the faith? Jesus promised that this will mhux happen, that the gates of hell will not prevail against her. Could it mean, instead, that in times to come the city of Rome will have become so utterly pagan in belief and practice that it becomes the seat of Antichrist? Again, very possible, particularly if the Holy Father is forced to flee the Vatican, as the approved prophecy of Fatima suggests, and as Pius X saw earlier in a vision:

What I have seen is terrifying! Will I be the one, or will it be a successor? What is certain is that the Pope will leave Rome and, in leaving the Vatican, he will have to pass over the dead bodies of his priests! —Ċf. ewtn.com

Another interpretation suggests that internal apostasy among clerics and laity could so weaken the exercise of the Petrine charism such that even many Catholics will become vulnerable to the deceiving power of the Antichrist. 

The fact is that there is not a single approved prophecy in the body of Catholic mysticism that predicts the Pope will ipso facto become the very instrument of hell against the Church, as opposed to its rock… though, certainly, many a pope has failed in his witness to Christ in the most scandalous ways

Il-Pietru ta 'wara Pentekoste ... huwa dak l-istess Pietru li, minħabba l-biża' tal-Lhud, ċaħad il-libertà Nisranija tiegħu (Galatin 2 11-14); huwa fl-istess ħin blat u xkiel. U ma kienx hekk matul l-istorja tal-Knisja li l-Papa, is-suċċessur ta ’Pietru, kien f’daqqa Petra u, Skandalon—Kemm il-blat ta ’Alla u xkiel? —PAPA BENEDIKT XIV, minn Das neue Volk Gottes, p. 80ff

 

A DIABOLICAL “PROPHECY”

However, there is one false prophet whose infamous messages linger on, even after several bishops (most importantly her own) have condemned her writings. She went by the pseudonym of “Maria Divine Mercy.” 

Archbishop Diarmuid Martin wishes to state that these messages and alleged visions have no ecclesiastical approval and many of the texts are in contradiction with Catholic theology. —Statement on Maria Divine Mercy, Archdioces of Dublin, Ireland; dublindiocese.ie

I have examined some of these messages and found them to be patently fraudulent and corrosive of true Christian faith as the Catholic Church teaches it. The alleged recipient of the messages operates anonymously and refuses to identify and present herself to local Church authority for a theological examination of the content of her messages. —Bishop Coleridge of Brisbane, Australia; cited by Bishop Richard. J. Malone of Buffalo; cf. mariadivinemercytrueorfalse.blogspot.ca

Not long after that statement, it was revealed that “Maria Divine Mercy” is Mary McGovern-Carberry of Dublin, Ireland. She ran the publication relations firm, McGovernPR, and reportedly had ties to a cult leader and convicted sex offender known as “Little Pebble,” and also to a clairvoyant named Joe Coleman. Witnesses allegedly observed her using kitba awtomatika, which is normally associated with demonic influence. When Carberry was outed, she shut down her website and Facebook page without any explanation and was even caught on security cameras buying up newspapers on the day her identity was exposed in Ireland.[4]cf. The Outing of Mary Carberry by Mark Saseen

In short, the brief emergence of Maria Divine Mercy (MDM) who gathered millions of readers, has been an absolute mess—a saga of kontradizzjonijiet, għata, ereżji, and most tragically, division. The essence of her writings is that Benedict XVI is the last true pope having been forced from the Chair of Peter and held hostage in the Vatican, and that his successor is the “false prophet” mentioned in the Book of Revelation. Of course, if this were true, then we should hear of the invalidity of that conclave from, at the very least, the “dubia” Cardinals, such as Raymond Burke, or the orthodox African contingent; or if true, then Benedict XVI “the last true pope” is actually a serial liar who has put his eternal soul at risk since he denies being pressured; or if true, then really, Jesus Christ has deceived His own Church by leading us into a trap.

U anke if MDM’s messages were without error, contradictions or failed predictions as they are, it is still disobedience for theologians and laymen alike to promote her works when they are explicitly unapproved.  

When someone first sent me a link to MDM, I spent about five minutes reading it. The very first thought that entered my mind was, “This is plagiarized.”  Not long after, Greek Orthodox seer Vassula Ryden made the very same assertion.[5]Note: Vassula is mhux a condemned seer, as some have alleged. See Il-Mistoqsijiet Tiegħek dwar l-Era tal-Paċi.  Moreover, aside from the errors in MDM’s writings, they also condemned anyone for questioning them, including Church authorities—a tactic used in cults to control. Many who zealously followed the writings, but later regained their equilibrium, have described the experience as cult-like. Indeed, if you point out the vast problems and corruption with the MDM phenomenon today, her remaining followers immediately invoke the persecution that Saints Faustina or Pio endured as proof how the “Church can get it wrong.” But there’s a huge difference: those saints did not teach error let alone antipapalism. 

If I were Satan, I would produce a “seer” who echoed what other authentic seers were saying. I would promote devotions like the Chaplet or Rosary to give the messages an air of piety. I would teach that the Pope cannot be trusted and that he is actually going to create a false church. I would suggest that the only true church is the one the “seer” is now leading the “remnant” through her messages. I would have her publish her own gospel, a “Book of Truth” that cannot be criticized; and I would have the seer present herself as the “last true prophet,” and frame anyone who questions her as virtual agents of the Antichrist. 

There, you have “Maria Divine Mercy.” 

 
A SIFTING
 
The present confusion in the Church is producing several unforeseen effects that are necessary: the ittestjar of the genuineness and depth of our faith (see Għaliex Tinsab Mnikkta?)
 
Benedict XVI taught that Our Lady is an “image of the Church to come.”[6]Spe Salvi, n.50 And Blessed Stella Isaac wrote:

Meta wieħed mit-tnejn huwa mitkellem, it-tifsira tista 'tinftiehem tat-tnejn, kważi mingħajr kwalifika. —Ibierek Iżakk ta ’Stella, Liturġija tas-Sigħat, Vol. I, pġ. 252

Thus the prophet Simeon’s words to Mother Mary can apply to us:

…and you yourself a sword will pierce so that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed. (Luke 2:35)

Clearly, the thoughts of many hearts are being revealed at this hour: [7]ara Meta l-Ħaxix ħażin jibda jmur those who were previously lingering in the shadows of modernism are now emerging like Judas into this night (see Id-Dish Dipping); those who have “rigidly” clung to their own ideas of how the Pope should run the Church, while unsheathing their “sword of truth,” are now fleeing the Garden (cf. Matt 26:51); and yet those who have remained small, humble and faithful like Our Lady, even when she did not understand our Lord’s ways,[8]cf. Luqa 2:50 are remaining at the foot of the Cross—there where His mystical Body, the Church, appears scourged, disfigured, and… nearly shipwrecked.

Which are you? Which one am I? 

Jekk ma qrajtx Il-Ħames Korrezzjonijietit is a must-read. Because here I believe the Lord, if not the Pope, revealed what He’s up to…. revealing qalbna before a final correction of the Church, and then the world, begins….

 

FOLLOW JESUS

Here is the “warning” that I have personally received from some readers since the first year of Pope Francis’ pontificate: “What if you’re wrong, Mark? What if Pope Francis really is the false prophet? You’ll lead all your readers into a trap! I will not follow this Pope!”

Can you see the dark irony in this statement? How can one accuse others of being deceived for remaining in unity with the Magisterium when they have declared themselves the ultimate arbiter on who is faithful and who is not? If they have determined that the Pope is an antipope, who then is their judge and infallible guide but their own ego? 

il Papa, Isqof ta ’Ruma u s-suċċessur ta’ Pietru, “huwa l- perpetwu u sors viżibbli u pedament tal-għaqda kemm tal-isqfijiet kif ukoll tal-kumpanija kollha tal-fidili. "-Katekiżmu tal-Knisja Kattolika, le. 882

On the other hand, St. Paul’s advice on how to prepare for and withstand the deception of the Antichrist was not to throw oneself blindly into an individual, but into the Tradition handed on by the entire Body of Christ. 

…stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught, either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours. (2 Thessalonians 2:15)

Il-ġisem kollu tal-fidili ... ma jistax jiżbalja fi kwistjonijiet ta 'twemmin. Din il-karatteristika tidher fl-apprezzament sopranaturali tal-fidi (sensus fidei) on the part of the whole people, when, from the bishops to the last of the faithful, they manifest a universal consent in matters of faith and morals. -Katekiżmu tal-Knisja Kattolika, le. 92

Those Traditions are built on 266 popes, not just one. If Pope Francis someday acts contrary to the Faith, or promotes mortal sin as normative, or orders the faithful to take what is clearly “the mark of the beast” etc., will I blindly obey and encourage others to do so as well? Of course not. At the very least, we’d have a crisis on our hands and perhaps a “Peter and Paul” moment where the Supreme Pontiff would need to be corrected by his brethren. Xi wħud jissuġġerixxu we’re already nearing such a moment. But for Heaven’s sake, it’s not like we are walking in the dark, blindly following a guide. We have the fullness of truth shining bright and clear and undiluted lighting the way before all of us, the Pope included.

There came a point when the Apostles faced a crisis of faith. They had to choose to either continue following Jesus or declare themselves wiser, and return to their former way of life.[9]cf. Ġwanni 6:66 At that moment, St. Peter simply declared: 

Mgħallem, għand min immorru? Għandek il-kliem tal-ħajja eterna. (Ġwanni 6:68)

I am reminded again of a prophecy, allegedly from Jesus, given before St. Peter’s successor, Pope Paul VI, in a gathering with the Charismatic Renewal 43 years ago:

Se nneħħilkom dak kollu li qed tiddependi minnu issa, allura tiddependi biss fuqi. Żmien ta ' id-dlam ġej fid-dinja, imma ġej żmien ta ’glorja għall-Knisja Tiegħi, a time of glory is coming for My people…. U meta ma jkollok xejn għajr Jien, ikollok kollox ... —St. Peter’s Square, Vatican City, Pentecost Monday, May, 1975

Perhaps what my reader above is experiencing—a conflicted heart—is part of this stripping. I think it is…. for all of us. 

 

QARI RELATATI

That Pope Francis… A Short Story

That Pope Francis… A Short Story – Part II

 

Jekk tixtieq tappoġġja l-bżonnijiet tal-familja tagħna,
sempliċement ikklikkja l-buttuna hawn taħt u inkludi l-kliem
"Għall-familja" fit-taqsima tal-kummenti. 
Bierek u grazzi!

 

Biex tivvjaġġa ma 'Mark ġewwa il Issa Kelma,
ikklikkja fuq il-banner hawn taħt biex jissottoskrivu.
L-email tiegħek ma tinqasam ma 'ħadd.

 

Stampa Friendly, PDF & Email

Noti f'qiegħ il-paġna

Noti f'qiegħ il-paġna
1 cf. Ġesù, il-Bennej Għaref
2 cf. Ġesù, il-Bennej Għaref
3 cf. POPE FRANCIS, closing remarks on the Synod; Aġenzija tal-Aħbarijiet Kattoliċi, It-18 ta ’Ottubru, 2014
4 cf. The Outing of Mary Carberry by Mark Saseen
5 Note: Vassula is mhux a condemned seer, as some have alleged. See Il-Mistoqsijiet Tiegħek dwar l-Era tal-Paċi.
6 Spe Salvi, n.50
7 ara Meta l-Ħaxix ħażin jibda jmur
8 cf. Luqa 2:50
9 cf. Ġwanni 6:66
Posted fil HOME, FIDI U MORALI u tagged , , , , , , , , , , .