Medjugorje… Abinda baku sani ba

Masu gani shida na Medjugorje lokacin da suke yara

 

Mawallafin gidan talabijin mai lambar yabo kuma marubucin Katolika, Mark Mallett, ya kalli ci gaban abubuwan da suka faru har zuwa yau… 

 
BAYAN Bayan bin bayyanar Medjugorje shekaru da yawa da bincike da kuma nazarin tarihin baya, abu ɗaya ya bayyana a sarari: akwai mutane da yawa waɗanda suka yi watsi da halin allahntaka na wannan rukunin yanar gizon bisa ga kalmomin shubuha na wasu. Cikakken guguwa na siyasa, karya, aikin jarida maras nauyi, magudi, da kafofin watsa labarai na Katolika galibi masu tsattsauran ra'ayi na kowane abu-sufi sun rura wutar, tsawon shekaru, labari cewa masu hangen nesa shida da gungun 'yan daba na Franciscan sun yi nasarar yaudarar duniya, ciki har da canonized saint, John Paul II.
 
Baƙon abu, ba damuwa ga wasu masu sukar cewa 'ya'yan Medjugorje — miliyoyin tuba, dubunnan masu ridda da kiran addini, da ɗaruruwan rubuce rubucen mu'ujizai. mafi ban mamaki da Ikilisiya ta taɓa gani tun, watakila, Fentikos. Don karanta shaida na mutanen da suka kasance a can (kamar yadda ya saba da kusan duk mai sukar da yawanci ba ya yi) yana kama da karanta Ayyukan Manzanni a kan steroid (ga nawa: Mu'ujiza ta rahama.) Mafi yawan masu sukar lamirin Medjugorje sun yi watsi da waɗannan 'ya'yan itacen a matsayin marasa ma'ana (ƙarin shaida a zamaninmu Rationalism, da Mutuwar Sirri) galibi suna ambaton tsegumi na jita-jita da jita-jita marasa tushe. Na amsa ga ashirin da huɗu daga waɗanda ke ciki Medjugorje da Bindigogin Shan Sigari, gami da zargin cewa masu ganin sun yi rashin biyayya. [1]duba kuma: "Michael Voris da Medjugorje" by Daniel O'Connor Bugu da ƙari, suna da'awar cewa "Shaiɗan ma zai iya bayar da kyawawan 'ya'ya!" Suna dogara ne akan wa'azin St. Paul:

… Irin waɗannan mutane manzannin ƙarya ne, mayaudaran ma'aikata, waɗanda suka mai da kansu kamar manzannin Kristi. Ba abin mamaki ba ne kuma, don Shaiɗan ma yakan mai da kansa kamar mala'ikan haske. Don haka ba abin mamaki ba ne cewa ministocinsa kuma sun mai da kansu kamar ministocin adalci. Arshensu zai yi daidai da ayyukansu. (2 Na 11: 13-15)

A gaskiya, St. Paul shine musu hujjarsu. Ya ce, hakika, za ku san itace ta bya itsan sa: Arshensu zai yi daidai da ayyukansu. ” Sauye-sauye, warkaswa, da kuma waƙoƙin da muka gani daga Medjugorje a cikin shekaru talatin da suka gabata sun nuna kansu da gaske kamar yadda yawancin waɗanda suka dandana su ke ɗauke da ingantaccen hasken Kristi shekaru baya. Wadanda suka san masu gani da kaina shaida ga tawali'unsu, amincinsu, sadaukarwar da tsarkakakkensu, wanda ya sabawa wauta da ya yadu akansu.[2]gwama Medjugorje da Bindigogin Shan Sigari Wane Nassi zahiri ya ce Shaidan na iya yin "alamun ƙarya da abubuwan al'ajabi".[3]cf. 2 Tas 2:9 Amma 'ya'yan itacen Ruhu? A'a Tsutsotsi zasu fito daga ƙarshe. Koyarwar Kristi bayyananne ne kuma amintacce:

Itacen kirki ba zai iya 'yayan' ya'ya marasa kyau ba, haka kuma ruɓaɓɓen itace ba zai iya 'ya'ya masu kyau ba. (Matiyu 7:18)

Tabbas, redungiyar Tsarkaka don Rukunan Addini ta ƙaryata batun cewa 'ya'yan itacen ba su da mahimmanci. Yana musamman tana nufin muhimmancin irin wannan sabon abu… 

… Kai fruitsa fruitsan fruitsa bya ta hanyar Cocin da kanta daga baya zata iya fahimtar yanayin gaskiyar abubuwan… - ”Ka’idoji Game da Hanyar Ciki a Fahimtar Wahayin Nunawa ko Wahayi” n. 2, Vatican.va
Waɗannan fruitsa fruitsan itace bayyanannu yakamata su motsa duk masu aminci, daga ƙasa zuwa sama, don kusanci Medjugorje cikin ruhun tawali'u da godiya, ba tare da la'akari da matsayin "hukuma" ba. Ba wuri na bane in faɗi wannan ko bayyanuwa gaskiya ne ko ƙarya. Amma abin da zan iya yi, a matsayina na adalci, ya saba wa ɓarna da yake a can don masu aminci su, aƙalla, su kasance a buɗe-kamar yadda Vatican ta kasance-da yiwuwar cewa Medjugorje babban alheri ne da aka ba duniya a wannan sa'ar. Wannan shine ainihin abin da wakilin Vatican a Medjugorje ya ce a ranar 25 ga Yuli, 2018:

Muna da babban nauyi a kan duk duniya, saboda da gaske Medjugorje ya zama wurin addu'a da juyawa ga duk duniya. Dangane da haka, Uba Mai Tsarki ya damu kuma ya aiko ni nan don taimakawa firistocin Franciscan don tsarawa da zuwa yarda da wannan wuri a matsayin tushen alheri ga duk duniya. —Archbishop Henryk Hoser, Papal Visitor da aka sanya don kula da kula da fastocin mahajjata; Idin St. James, Yuli 25th, 2018; MaryTV.TV
Ya ku ƙaunatattun yara, ainihin kasancewar ku a cikin ku ya kamata ya sa ku farin ciki saboda wannan shine babban ƙaunar myana. Yana aiko ni a cikin ku domin, da kauna irin ta uwa, zan ba ku lafiya! - Uwargidanmu ta Medjugorje zuwa Mirjana, 2 ga Yuli, 2016

 

Bakon TWISTS…

A hakikanin gaskiya, Bishop na garin Mostar, diocese inda Medjugorje ke zaune ya karɓi bayyanar Medjugorje. Da yake magana game da amincin masu gani, ya ce:
Babu wanda ya tilasta su ko rinjayar su ta kowace hanya. Waɗannan yara shida ne na al'ada; ba karya suke yi ba; suna bayyana kansu daga zurfin zukatansu. Shin muna hulɗa anan da hangen nesanmu ko abin da ya faru na allahntaka? Yana da wuya a ce. Koyaya, ya tabbata cewa ba ƙarya suke yi ba. - sanarwa ga ‘yan jarida, 25 ga Yuli, 1981; “Yaudarar Medjugorje ko Mu’ujiza?”; ewn.com
'Yan sanda sun tabbatar da wannan matsayi mai kyau wanda ya fara binciken tunanin mutum na farko da masu gani don sanin ko suna cikin tunani ko kuma kawai suna kokarin haifar da matsala. An kai yaran asibitin masu tabin hankali da ke Mostar inda aka yi musu tambayoyi masu tsanani kuma aka nuna su ga marasa lafiyar da ke da tabin hankali don tsoratar da su. Bayan wucewa kowane gwaji, Dokta Mulija Dzudza, musulma, ta bayyana:
Ban ga yara na al'ada ba. Mutanen da suka kawo ku ne ya kamata a ce mahaukata ne! -Medjugorje, Kwanakin Farko, James Mulligan, Ch. 8 
Daga baya aka tabbatar da ƙarshenta ta hanyar binciken halayyar ɗan adam, [4]Fr. Slavko Barabic ya wallafa nazarin hanyoyin da hangen nesa a cikin De Apparizioni na Medjugorje a 1982. sannan kuma daga kungiyoyin masana kimiyya na duniya da dama a cikin shekaru masu zuwa. A zahiri, bayan sallama masu gani ga wani batirin gwaje-gwaje yayin da suke cikin annashuwa yayin bayyanar su - daga caccaka da tsokana zuwa busa su da hayaniya da sa ido kan yanayin kwakwalwa - Dr. Henri Joyeux da tawagarsa ta likitoci daga Faransa sun kammala:

Abubuwan farin ciki ba su da wata cuta, kuma babu wani yanki na yaudara. Babu wani horo na kimiyya da ya isa ya iya bayanin waɗannan abubuwan. Abubuwan da suka bayyana a Medjugorje ba za a iya bayanin su ta hanyar kimiyya ba. A wata kalma, waɗannan matasa suna cikin ƙoshin lafiya, kuma babu alamar farfadiya, haka kuma ba yanayin bacci, mafarki, ko halin hayyaci ba. Lamarin ba shi ne na mawuyacin yanayin cuta ba ko na mafarki a cikin ji ko wuraren gani…. —8: 201-204; "Kimiyya na Gwajin Masu Ganin hangen nesa", cf. akabarka.info

Kwanan nan, a cikin 2006, membobin ƙungiyar Dr. Joyeux sun sake yin nazarin wasu masu gani yayin murna da aika sakamakon zuwa Paparoma Benedict.
Bayan shekaru ashirin, ƙarshenmu bai canza ba. Ba mu yi kuskure ba. Conclusionarshen iliminmu a bayyane yake: dole ne a ɗauki al'amuran Medjugorje da mahimmanci. -Dr. Henri Joyeux, Međugorje Tribune, Janairu 2007
Koyaya, kamar yadda Antonio Gaspari, mai kula da editocin labarai na kamfanin dillancin labarai na Zenit ya lura, jim kadan bayan amincewa da Bishop Zanic…
… Saboda dalilai har yanzu ba su bayyana karara ba, Bishop Zanic kusan nan da nan ya canza halinsa, ya zama babban mai suki da mai adawa da bayyanar Medjugorje. - “Yaudarar Medjugorje ko Mu’ujiza?”; ewn.com
Wani sabon shirin gaskiya, Daga Fatima zuwa Medjugorje yana nuna matsin lamba daga gwamnatin kwaminisanci da KGB akan Bishop Zanic saboda tsoron cewa kwaminisanci zai ruguje daga farkawar addini da ke faruwa ta hanyar Medjugorje. Takardun Rasha sun yi zargin sun nuna cewa sun batar da shi da rubutattun shaidu na halin “sasantawa” da ya kasance tare da “saurayi.” A sakamakon haka, kuma wanda aka tabbatar da shi ta hanyar rikodin shaidar wakilin kwaminisanci da ke cikin lamarin, Bishop din ya yi ikirarin yarda da murkushe abubuwan da ke faruwa don ya yi shiru a baya. [5]cf. kallo "Daga Fatima zuwa Medjugorje" Diocese na Mostar, kodayake, ta rubuta martani mai zafi da neman hujja akan waɗannan takardun. [6]gwama md-tm.ba/clanci/calumnies-fim [TAMBAYOYI: shirin gaskiya ya kasance ba ta kan layi kuma babu wani bayani game da dalilin. A wannan lokacin, dole ne a tunkari waɗannan zarge-zargen cikin taka tsantsan da adanawa, saboda babu wata cikakkiyar shaida da ta bayyana tun lokacin da aka saki fim ɗin. A wannan gaba, rashin laifin bishop tilas za a zaci.]
 
Na sami wannan sadarwa daga Sharon Freeman wacce ke aiki a Cibiyar Ave Maria da ke Toronto. Ita da kanta ta yi hira da Bishop Zanic bayan ya canza halinsa game da bayyanar. Wannan shine ra'ayinta:
Zan iya cewa wannan taron ya tabbatar min da cewa kwaminisanci ne ke damunsa. Ya kasance mai daɗi ƙwarai kuma ya bayyana a bayyane ta yanayin ɗabi'arsa da lafazin jikinsa cewa har yanzu yana gaskanta da bayyanar amma an tilasta masa ya musanta sahihancinsu. - Nuwamba 11, 2017
Sauran suna nuna fashewar rikice-rikice tsakanin diocese da Franciscans, waɗanda ke ƙarƙashin kulawar Ikklesiyar Medjugorje, da haka masu gani. A bayyane yake, lokacin da bishop din ya dakatar da wasu limaman cocin biyu na Franciscan, sai aka ce mai gani Vicka ya yi magana: “Uwargidanmu tana son a fada wa bishop din cewa ya yanke shawara da wuri. Bari ya sake yin tunani, kuma ya saurara da kyau ga ɓangarorin biyu. Dole ne ya zama mai adalci da haƙuri. Ta ce duka firistocin biyu ba su da laifi. ” Wannan zargi da ake zargin daga Uwargidanmu an ce ya canza matsayin Bishop Zanic. Kamar yadda ya zama, a cikin 1993, da Apostolic Signatura Tribunal ta yanke hukuncin cewa sanarwar bishop na 'ad statem laicalem' a kan firistoci ya kasance "rashin adalci da doka". [7]gwama churchinhistory.org; Kotun Sa hannu ta Apostolic, Maris 27, 1993, shari’a mai lamba 17907 / 86CA “Kalmar” Vicka tayi gaskiya.
 
Wataƙila saboda ɗaya ko duka dalilan da ke sama, Bishop Zanic ya ƙi amincewa da sakamakon Kwamitinsa na farko kuma ya ci gaba da kafa sabuwar Hukumar da za ta bincika abubuwan da suka fito. Amma yanzu, an tara shi da masu shakka. 
Tara daga cikin membobi 14 na kwamiti na biyu (mafi girma) an zaba cikin wasu masana tauhidi wadanda aka san su da shakku game da al'amuran allahntaka. —Antonio Gaspari, “Yaudarar Medjugorje ko Mu’ujiza?”; ewn.com
Michael K. Jones (kada a rude shi da Michael E. Jones, wanda ake zargi da adawa mafi tsaurin ra'ayi na Medjugorje) ya tabbatar da abin da Gaspari ya ruwaito. Amfani da Dokar 'Yancin Ba da Bayani, Jones ya ce a kan shi yanar cewa ya sami takaddun takardu daga binciken da Ma'aikatar Harkokin Wajen Amurka ta yi game da bayyanar da Ambasada David Anderson ya yi a karkashin gwamnatin Shugaba Ronald Reagan. Rahoton da aka tura, wanda aka tura zuwa fadar Vatican, ya nuna cewa lallai kwamitin Bishop Zanic 'ya gurbata', in ji Jones. 
 
Tunda haka lamarin yake, yana bayar da bayani guda daya da yasa Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, a matsayin Prefect na Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, ya ki amincewa da kwamiti na biyu na Zanic kuma ya tura ikon kan abubuwan da suka bayyana zuwa matakin yanki na taron Bishops na Yugoslav inda sabon An kafa Hukumar. Koyaya, Bishop Zanic ya ba da sanarwar manema labarai tare da ƙarin bayani mai gamsarwa:
A yayin binciken wadannan abubuwan da ake gudanar da bincike sun bayyana sun wuce iyakokin diocese din. Sabili da haka, bisa ƙa'idodin da aka faɗi, ya zama ya dace a ci gaba da aiki a matakin Taron Bishops, kuma don haka kafa sabuwar Hukumar don wannan dalilin. - ya bayyana a shafin farko na - Glas Koncila, Janairu 18, 1987; ewn.com
 
… DA Bakon Juya
 
Shekaru huɗu bayan haka, sabon Kwamitin na Bishop ya ba da sanarwar sanannen Zadar a yanzu a ranar 10 ga Afrilu, 1991, wanda ya ce:
Dangane da binciken ya zuwa yanzu, ba za a iya tabbatar da cewa mutum yana ma'amala da bayyanar allahntaka da wahayi ba. - cf. Wasikar da aka rubuta wa Bishop Gilbert Aubry daga Sakatare na Ikilisiyar Doctrine of Faith, Akbishop Tarcisio Bertone; ewn.com
Yanke shawara, a cikin Cocin-magana, shine: na kan babban allahntaka, wanda ke nufin kawai cewa, “Ya zuwa yanzu”, ba za a iya tabbatar da tabbataccen ƙarshe game da yanayin allahntaka ba. Ba hukunci bane amma dakatar da hukunci. 
 
Amma abin da watakila ba a sani ba shi ne cewa 'a tsakiyar 1988, an ba da rahoton Hukumar ta dakatar da aikinta tare da yanke hukunci mai kyau kan abubuwan da suka fito.' 
Cardinal Franjo Kuharic, Archbishop na Zaghreb kuma Shugaban taron Bishops na Yugoslav, a wata hira da ya yi da gidan talabijin na Croatian a ranar 23 ga Disamba, 1990, ya ce taron Bishops na Yugoslav, ciki har da shi kansa, “yana da ra’ayi mai kyau game da abubuwan da suka faru a Medjugorje.” - cf. Antonio Gaspari, "Yaudarar Medjugorje ko Mu'ujiza?"; ewn.com
Amma tabbas Bishop Zanic bai yi ba. Akbishop Frane Franic, Shugaban Kwamitin Koyaswa na taron Bishops na Yugoslav, ya bayyana a wata hira da jaridar Italia ta yau da kullun. Corriere della Sera, [8]Janairu 15, 1991 cewa kawai mummunar hamayyar Bishop Zanic, wanda ya ki yarda da hukuncin nasa, ya hana yanke shawara mai kyau game da bayyanar Medjugorje. [9]cf. Antonio Gaspari, "Yaudarar Medjugorje ko Mu'ujiza?"; ewn.com
Bishop din sunyi amfani da wannan jumla mai ban tsoro (non constat de ikon allahntaka) saboda ba sa so su wulakanta Bishop Pavao Zanic na Mostar wanda ke yawan ikirarin cewa Uwargidanmu ba ta bayyana ga masu gani ba. Lokacin da Bishops din Yugoslav suka tattauna batun Medjugorje, sai suka fadawa Bishop Zanic cewa Cocin ba ta yanke hukunci a kan Medjugorje ba saboda haka adawarsa bata da tushe. Jin haka, sai Bishop Zanic ya fara kuka da ihu, sauran bishof din kuma daga nan suka daina duk wata tattaunawa. - Akbishop Frane Franic a fitowar 6 ga Janairu, 1991 na Slobodna Dalmacija; wanda aka ambata a cikin "Katolika Media yada labarai na karya akan Medjugorje", Maris 9th, 2017; karwanan.com
Magajin Bishop Zanic ba shi da wani tagomashi ko karancin magana, wanda hakan ba abin mamaki ba ne. A cewar Mary TV, Bishop Ratko Peric ya ci gaba da yin rikodin a gaban shaidu cewa bai taba saduwa ko magana da wani daga cikin masu hangen nesa ba kuma bai yi imani da sauran bayyanar da Uwargidanmu ba, musamman suna Fatima da Lourdes. 

Na yi imanin abin da ake buƙata na yi imani da shi - wannan shine koyarwar acaƙƙarfan whichaƙa wanda aka bayar shekaru huɗu kafin zargin bayyanar Bernadette. —Da shaida a cikin rantsuwar sanarwa da Fr. John Chisholm da Manjo Janar (ret.) Liam Prendergast; an kuma buga bayanan a cikin jaridar Turai ta 1 ga Fabrairu, 2001, “Duniya”; cf. karwanan.com

Bishop Peric ya zarce na Hukumar Yugoslav da sanarwar da suka yi kuma kai tsaye ya bayyana bayyanar abubuwan karya ne. Amma a wannan lokacin, fadar ta Vatican, wacce ke fuskantar kyawawan 'ya'yan itace masu kyau na Medjugorje, ta fara farkon jerin tsoma baki zuwa kiyaye shafin hajji a bude ga mai aminci da duk wata sanarwa mara kyau daga samun gogayya. [Lura: a yau, sabon bishop na Mostar, Rev. Petar Palić, ya bayyana kai tsaye: "Kamar yadda aka sani, Medjugorje yanzu haka tana karkashin kulawar Holy See.][10]gwama Shaidar Medjugorje A cikin wata wasika ta bayani zuwa ga Bishop Gilbert Aubry, Akbishop Tarcisio Bertone na regungiyar Tabbatar da Addini ya rubuta:
Abin da Bishop Peric ya fada a cikin wasikarsa zuwa ga Sakatare Janar na “Famille Chretienne”, yana mai cewa: “Zuciyata da matsayina ba wai kawai‘non constat de ikon allahntaka, 'amma kuma,'constat de ba allahntaka ba'[ba na allahntaka ba] na bayyanar ko wahayi a cikin Medjugorje ”, ya kamata a yi la’akari da furucin da Bishop na Mostar ya yi wanda yake da haƙƙin bayyanawa a matsayin Talakawan wurin, amma wanda yake kuma ya kasance ra'ayinsa na kansa. –May 26, 1998; ewn.com
Kuma hakan kuwa ta kasance - duk da cewa hakan bai hana Bishop ci gaba da yin kalamai na bata rai ba. Kuma me yasa, lokacin da ya bayyana cewa Vatican ta ci gaba da bincike? Amsa daya na iya zama tasirin yakin duhun karya lies
 
 
KAMFANAR KARYA

A cikin tafiye-tafiye na, na haɗu da wani sanannen ɗan jarida (wanda ya nemi a sakaya sunan sa) wanda ya ba ni labarin ilimin hannu na na farko na abubuwan da suka faru a tsakiyar 1990s. Wani Ba'amurke mai yawan miloniya daga Kalifoniya, wanda shi kansa ya san shi, ya fara kamfen mai zafi don zubar da mutuncin Medjugorje da sauran zargin da ake yi wa Marian saboda matar sa, wacce ke sadaukar da kai ga irin wannan, ta bar shi (don cutar da hankali). Ya yi alwashin halakar da Medjugorje idan ba ta dawo ba, duk da cewa ya kasance a can sau da yawa kuma ya yi imani da shi da kansa. Ya kashe miliyoyi don yin haka - haya ma'aikatan kyamara daga Ingila don yin shirye-shiryen fina-finai da ke bata sunan Medjugorje, yana aika dubun dubun wasika (zuwa wurare kamar Wanderer), har ma da shiga cikin ofishin Cardinal Ratzinger! Ya watsa kowane irin kwandon shara - abubuwan da a yanzu muke jin sakewa da sake sakewa, inji dan jaridar, wanda hakan ya shafi Bishop na Mostar shi ma. Attajirin ya yi mummunar lalacewa kafin daga ƙarshe ya rasa kuɗi kuma ya sami kansa a kan kuskuren doka. Majiya ta ta kiyasta cewa kashi 90% na kayan anti-Medjugorje da ke wajen sun zo ne sakamakon wannan ruhun da ya damu.

A lokacin, wannan ɗan jaridar ba ya son ya san miliyon, kuma wataƙila da kyakkyawan dalili. Mutumin ya riga ya lalata wasu ma'aikatu na goyon bayan Medjugorje ta hanyar kamfen ɗin sa na ƙarairayi. Kwanan nan, duk da haka, na ci karo da wasiƙa daga wata mata, Ardath Talley, wacce ta auri marigayi Phillip Kronzer wanda ya mutu a shekarar 2016. Ta yi wani bayani wanda kwanan wata 19 ga Oktoba, 1998 wanda yake madubi ne na labarin ɗan jaridar. zuwa gare ni. 

A cikin watannin da suka gabata tsohon mijina, Phillip J. Kronzer, yana ta shirya wani kamfe na bata sunan kungiyar Marian da Medjugorje. Wannan kamfen, wanda ke amfani da wallafe-wallafe da bidiyo na kai hari, ya lalata mutane da yawa marasa laifi da bayanan ƙarya da ɓatanci. Kodayake, kamar yadda muka sani, Vatican ta kasance a buɗe sosai ga Medjugorje, kuma majami'ar hukuma tana ci gaba da bincike a kanta kuma kwanan nan ta sake bayyana wannan matsayin, Mr. Kronzer da waɗanda suke aiki tare ko tare da shi sun nemi bayyana bayyanar ta hanyar da ba ta dace ba kuma sun yayata jita-jita da maganganu marasa ma'ana. - ana iya karanta cikakken wasika nan

Wataƙila an yi la'akari da wannan lokacin da a cikin 2010 Fadar Vatican ta buge Kwamiti na huɗu don bincika Medjugorje ƙarƙashin Cardinal Camillo Ruini. Karatun wannan Hukumar, wanda aka kammala a shekarar 2014, yanzu an ba shi ga Paparoma Francis. Amma ba tare da sau ɗaya na ƙarshe na tarihi ba.

 
 
SAMUN LAFIYA
 
The Vatican Mai ciki ya fallasa binciken mambobi goma sha biyar na Ruini, kuma suna da mahimmanci. 
Hukumar ta lura da bambancin da ke tsakanin farkon lamarin da ci gaban da ke tafe, saboda haka ta yanke shawarar bayar da kuri'u biyu daban-daban a kan bangarorin daban-daban: na farko da ake zato [wadanda suka fito] tsakanin 24 ga Yunin da 3 ga Yulin 1981, da duk hakan ya faru daga baya. Membobi da masana sun fito da kuri'u 13 a cikin ni'imar na fahimtar yanayin allahntaka na wahayin farko. - Mayu 17th, 2017; Rajistar Katolika ta ƙasa
A karo na farko a cikin shekaru 36 tun lokacin da bayyanar ta fara, Hukumar tana da alama "a hukumance" ta karɓi asalin allahntaka na abin da ya fara a 1981: cewa hakika, Uwar Allah ta bayyana a Medjugorje. Bugu da ƙari, Hukumar ta bayyana cewa ta tabbatar da sakamakon binciken tunanin ɗan adam na masu hangen nesa da kuma tabbatar da amincin masu gani, wanda waɗanda suka ɓata musu rai suka daɗe suna kai hare-hare, wani lokacin ba tare da tausayi ba. 

Kwamitin yayi jayayya cewa samarin masu gani shida suna da hankali kuma sun kasance masu mamakin bayyanar, kuma babu wani abu daga abinda suka gani wanda ya shafi tasirin Franciscans na cocin ko kuma wasu batutuwa. Sun nuna juriya wajen faɗar abin da ya faru duk da cewa 'yan sanda sun kama su kuma sun yi barazanar kashe su. Hukumar kuma ta ƙi yarda da zancen asalin aljanu na bayyanar. - Ibid.
Game da bayyanar bayan lokuta bakwai na farko, mambobin Hukumar suna dogaro da kyakkyawar alkibla tare da ra'ayoyi mabanbanta: “A wannan batun, mambobi 3 da masana 3 sun ce akwai kyakkyawan sakamako, mambobi 4 da masana 3 sun ce sun cakuɗe , tare da mafi rinjaye na tabbatacce… kuma sauran masana 3 da suka yi iƙirarin akwai maganganu masu kyau da marasa kyau. ” [11]16 ga Mayu, 2017; latsampa.it Don haka, yanzu Coci na jiran magana ta ƙarshe game da rahoton na Ruini, wanda zai fito daga Paparoma Francis da kansa. 
 
A ranar 7 ga Disamba, 2017, babban sanarwa ya zo ta hanyar wakilin Paparoma Francis zuwa Medjugorje, Akbishop Henryk Hoser. Haramcin kan aikin hajji “a hukumance” yanzu an dauke shi:
An yarda da ibadar Medjugorje. Ba a hana shi ba, kuma ba a bukatar a yi shi a asirce… A yau, dioceses da sauran cibiyoyi na iya tsara aikin hajji na hukuma. Yanzu ba matsala bane… Dokar tsohon taron bishop na abin da ya kasance Yugoslavia, wanda, kafin yakin Balkan, ya ba da shawara game da yin tafiya a Medjugorje da bishops suka shirya, ba shi da amfani. -Aleitia, 7 ga Disamba, 2017
Kuma, a ranar 12 ga watan Mayu, 2019, Paparoma Francis a hukumance ya ba da izinin yin tafiye-tafiye zuwa Medjugorje tare da “kulawa don hana a fassara wadannan hajji a matsayin sahihancin abubuwan da aka sani, wanda har yanzu Cocin na bukatar jarrabawa,” a cewar mai magana da yawun Vatican. [12]Vatican News
 
Tunda Paparoma Francis ya rigaya ya nuna amincewarsa ga rahoton kwamitin na Ruini, yana mai kiransa “da kyau ƙwarai da gaske”,[13]USNews.com da alama alamar tambaya akan Medjugorje tana saurin ɓacewa.
 
 
HAKURI, JUYA, BIYAYYA… DA TAWALI'U
 
A rufe, Bishop na Mostar ne wanda ya taɓa cewa:

Yayin jiran sakamakon aikin Hukumar da hukuncin Ikilisiya, bari Fastoci da amintattu su girmama aikin tsabtar da aka saba a irin wannan yanayi. - daga wata sanarwa da aka fitar a ranar 9 ga Janairun 1987; sa hannun Cardinal Franjo Kuharic, shugaban taron Yugoslavia na Bishops da kuma Bishop Pavao Zanic na Mostar
Wannan shawarar tana da amfani a yau kamar yadda take a dā. Hakanan, hikimar Gamaliel za ta iya zama mai dacewa: 
Idan wannan yunƙurin ko wannan aikin daga asalin ɗan adam ne, zai lalata kansa. Amma in ya zo daga wurin Allah ne, ba za ku iya hallaka su ba; har ma kuna iya ganin kanku kuna yakar Allah. (Ayukan Manzanni 5: 38-39)

 

KARANTA KASHE

Akan Medjugorje

Me yasa Ka faɗi Medjugorje?

Medjugorje da Bindigogin Shan Sigari

Medjugorje: “Gaskiya kawai, Maamu”

Wannan Medjugorje

Sabon Gidiyon

Ba a Fahimci Annabci ba

A Wahayin Gashi

Akan Masu gani da hangen nesa

Kunna Motsa Yankin

Lokacin Da Duwatsu Suke Iri

Jifan Annabawa


Yi muku albarka kuma na gode 
don goyon bayanku ga wannan hidima ta cikakken lokaci.

 

Don tafiya tare da Mark a cikin The Yanzu Kalma,
danna banner da ke ƙasa zuwa biyan kuɗi.
Ba za a raba imel ɗinka da kowa ba.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Bayanan kalmomi

Bayanan kalmomi
1 duba kuma: "Michael Voris da Medjugorje" by Daniel O'Connor
2 gwama Medjugorje da Bindigogin Shan Sigari
3 cf. 2 Tas 2:9
4 Fr. Slavko Barabic ya wallafa nazarin hanyoyin da hangen nesa a cikin De Apparizioni na Medjugorje a 1982.
5 cf. kallo "Daga Fatima zuwa Medjugorje"
6 gwama md-tm.ba/clanci/calumnies-fim
7 gwama churchinhistory.org; Kotun Sa hannu ta Apostolic, Maris 27, 1993, shari’a mai lamba 17907 / 86CA
8 Janairu 15, 1991
9 cf. Antonio Gaspari, "Yaudarar Medjugorje ko Mu'ujiza?"; ewn.com
10 gwama Shaidar Medjugorje
11 16 ga Mayu, 2017; latsampa.it
12 Vatican News
13 USNews.com
Posted in GIDA, MARYA.