Mark Mallett is a former award-winning journalist with CTV News Edmonton (CFRN TV) and resides in Canada.
IT’S a year unlike any other on planet earth. Many know deep down that there is something very wrong taking place. No one is allowed to have an opinion any more, no matter how many PhD’s behind their name. No one has the freedom any longer to make their own medical choices (“My body, my choice” no longer applies). No one is allowed to engage facts publicly without being censored or even dismissed from their careers. Rather, we have entered a period reminiscent of the powerful propaganda and intimidation campaigns that immediately preceded the most distressing dictatorships (and genocides) of the past century. Volksgesundheit — for the “Public Health” — was a centrepiece in Hitler’s plan.
In democratic societies, the needs of public health sometimes require citizens to make sacrifices for the greater good, but in Nazi Germany, national or public health — Volksgesundheit — took complete precedence over individual health care. Physicians and medically trained academics, many of whom were proponents of “racial hygiene,” or eugenics, legitimized and helped to implement Nazi policies aiming to “cleanse” German society of people viewed as biologic threats to the nation’s health. —In the Name of Public Health — Nazi Racial Hygiene by Susan Bachrach, Ph.D.
With CNN’s Don Lemon calling for the “unvaccinated” to be barred from grocery stores, or Piers Morgan demanding that the unvaccinated be barred from health care, Volksgesundheit has returned with a frothing vengeance — this time against those nasty, selfish healthy people who dare to trust their powerful natural immunity, as millennia of descendants did before them. Even the existence of concentration “camps” for “high risk individuals” (ie. the unvaccinated?) is no conspiracy theory and is detailed on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website. The fact that many are losing their jobs as we speak for refusing the jab brings this reality very much home. We are headed toward one of the most divisive and destructive periods perhaps in human history — and propaganda, once again, is playing a central role.
Of course, for those with an indomitable faith in the media (“They would never lie to us”), I’ll just remind them again of how the mainstream media silenced, opposed, and censored anyone who suggested that the current coronavirus originated from a laboratory in Wuhan where it was undergoing “gain of function” research (ie. creating a bioweapon).A paper from South China’s University of Technology claims ‘the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan.'(Feb. 16th, 2020; dailymail.co.uk) In early February 2020, Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the U.S. “Biological Weapons Act”, gave a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about it.(cf. zerohedge.com) An Israeli biological warfare analyst said much the same.(Jan. 26th, 2020; washingtontimes.com) Dr. Peter Chumakov of Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology and Russian Academy of Sciences claims that “while the Wuhan scientists’ goal in creating the coronavirus was not malicious—instead, they were trying to study the pathogenicity of the virus… They did absolutely crazy things… For example, inserts in the genome, which gave the virus the ability to infect human cells.”(zerohedge.com) Professor Luc Montagnier, 2008 Nobel Prize winner for Medicine and the man who discovered the HIV virus in 1983, claims that SARS-CoV-2 is a manipulated virus that was accidentally released from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.(cf. mercola.com) A new documentary, quoting several scientists, points toward COVID-19 as an engineered virus.(mercola.com) A team of Australian scientists has produced new evidence the novel coronavirus shows signs “of human intervention.”(lifesitenews.com; washingtontimes.com) Former head of the British intelligence agency M16, Sir Richard Dearlove, said he believes the COVID-19 virus was created in a lab and spread accidentally.(jpost.com) A joint British-Norwegian study alleges that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is a “chimera” constructed in a Chinese lab.(Taiwannews.com) Professor Giuseppe Tritto, an internationally known expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology and president of the World Academy of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies (WABT) says that “It was genetically engineered in the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 (high-containment) lab in a program supervised by the Chinese military.”(lifesitnews.com) Respected Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan, who fled Hong Kong after exposing Bejing’s knowledge of the coronavirus well before reports of it emerged, stated that “the meat market in Wuhan is a smoke screen and this virus is not from nature… It comes from the lab in Wuhan.”(dailymail.co.uk ) And former CDC Director Robert Redfield also says COVID-19 ‘most likely’ came from Wuhan lab.(washingtonexaminer.com) But now, this “conspiracy theory” is widely accepted as fact.
So-called “conspiracy theorists” are more often than not simply diligent people who’ve done their homework — unlike paid journalists who are often merely reading a carefully crafted and highly controlled narrative. In fact, a new study found that the most “vaccine hesitant” are those with PhD’s.August 11th, 2021; unherd.com Think about that.
What else has the media gotten wrong?
THE TOP TEN FABLES
I have compiled the Top Ten Pandemic Fables that are constantly streaming across mainstream news. CNN, for example, is a veritable dumpster fire of pseudo-science and propaganda the likes of which I’ve never seen in my lifetime since I became a member of the media in the mid-90’s. Don’t get me wrong; I don’t think CNN and their likes (on both the “left” and “right”) are just abusing journalism; they’re actually a threat to democracy. Their use of fear and convenient omission of facts to manipulate the public is not journalism but what Pope Francis once aptly compared to coprophilia: the arousal from excrement or feces.
I am convinced that we have to break the vicious circle of anxiety and stem the spiral of fear resulting from a constant focus on ‘bad news’… This has nothing to do with spreading misinformation that would ignore the tragedy of human suffering, nor is it about a naive optimism blind to the scandal of evil. —POPE FRANCIS, January 24th, 2017, usatoday.com; cf. Fake News, Real Revolution
David Redman, a former head of the Alberta Emergency Management Agency, writes in his recent paper: “Canada’s Deadly Response to COVID-19”:
The Canadian “lockdown” response will kill at least 10 times more than it might have saved from the actual virus, COVID-19. The unconscionable use of fear during an emergency, to ensure compliance, has caused a breach in confidence in government that will last a decade or more. The damage to our democracy will last at least a generation. —July 2021, page 5, “Canada’s Deadly Response to COVID-19”:
Of course, your first question may be what makes this following list any more true than the mainstream media’s? For one, we are actually citing world renowned experts and official documentation — not in-house media doctors, insiders with the CDC or WHO, Pharma-friendly spokesmen, or anonymous “fact-checkers.” Second, we aren’t censoring opposing views and present the data and studies, which are open to further analysis and criticism (which is what science used to do). Third, we are citing the long standing science that was often quietly and conveniently, and without evidence, changed in the last year in order to create a greater crisis than there actually is.cf. The Case Against Gates Fourth, those speaking up against the highly controlled news narrative are being punished for doing so, which begs the question: why would they risk their entire careers and livelihood to go counter to the propaganda machine? Fifth, unlike Facebook’s fact-checker who is funded by a group with $1.9 billion in stocks in a vaccine company, there is no monetary gain for those defending actual science these days.
The disease “COVID-19” is not a hoax… but the scale of this crisis certainly has been. Here is why actual experts say so…
1. PCR TESTING
The highly controversial Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests are what have been used worldwide to test the populace for the coronavirus: SARS-CoV-2. However, several international courts have condemned the tests as “not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2″Portugal: geopolitic.org/2020/11/21; the Austrian courts have ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns have no legal or scientific basis. greatgameindia.com and in December 2020, a published study confirmed that “The certainty of the evidence was judged as very low due to the risk of bias, indirectness, and inconsistency issues.”
The reason is very straightforward. A sample swab of RNA is taken from your nasal cavity and then amplified a set number of cycles. Dr. Anthony Fauci, who also advises President Joe Biden on the pandemic, himself warned:
If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule… it’s just dead nucleotides [above that]. —9:16 mark in documentary Following the Science?
However, inexplicably, the CDC recommended that testing go to within 40 cycles pg. 34, https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download and the World Health Organization (WHO) at 45 cycles. cf. 9:44 mark in documentary Following the Science? So, for example, the Kansas Health and Environmental Laboratories used 42 cycles.communitycareks.org This criteria created what the New York Times reported to be a landslide of false-positive results of “up to 90 percent”nytimes.com/2020/08/29 leading health organizations around the world to declare a veritable “casedemic” that continues to this hour. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons published an article asking, “COVID-19: Do We Have a Coronavirus Pandemic, or a PCR Test Pandemic?”October 7th, 2020; aapsonline.org while the Bulgarian Pathology Association declared, “COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless.”January 7th, 2020, bpa-pathology.com
A massive German study published in The Journal of Infection in December of 2020 concluded:
In light of our findings that more than half of individuals with positive PCR test results are unlikely to have been infectious, RT-PCR test positivity should not be taken as an accurate measure of infectious SARS-CoV-2 incidence. — “The performance of the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test as a tool for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the population”, December 8th, 2020; journalofinfection.com
Then, in a surprise turnabout in July 2021, the CDC abruptly dropped its recommendation for the PCR test calling for something capable of distinguishing between SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal influenza — a stunning admission of the test’s limitations. No wonder, reports Yahoo:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) urged labs this week to stock clinics with kits that can test for both the coronavirus and the flu as the “influenza season” draws near… There were 646 deaths relating to the flu among adults reported in 2020, whereas in 2019 the CDC estimated that between 24,000 and 62,000 people died from influenza-related illnesses. —July 24th, 2021; yahoo.com
Oops. Oh well. Nonetheless, the PCR tests, to this day, continue to be used to report “cases” — even though the tests, by themselves, are indeed “scientifically meaningless,” leading Dr. Astrid Stückelberger, PhD, who works with the WHO, to call the tests “intentionally criminal.”interview with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich; mercola.com She wasn’t alone:
This is a blatant lie and it’s being done all over the world… the PCR method developed by [Dr. Terry] Mullis who got the Nobel prize for this, he himself said, do not use this test for diagnosis… In fact, this test should be trashed immediately worldwide, and it should be considered a criminal act for anyone to be sent to quarantine because this test was positive. —Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Interview, dryburgh.com, February 12th, 2021
In one of the greatest “sleight of hands” of the century, the media began reporting these “positive tests” as “cases.” But not only do we know now that the hysteria created by those “case” numbers on your TV screen are grossly false, but the very use of the term “case” has been abused.
The medical term “case” always referred to someone who was actually sick — until 2020. Now anyone who tests “positive” is deemed a “case,” even if they have no symptoms or active viral infection. “They’re testing people and calling them ‘cases’. That is not epidemiology — that’s fraud,” declared Dr. Lee Merritt, former President of the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons.The Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, August 16, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada; video here
A case is normally somebody who has symptoms, it is not normally somebody who is completely healthy. So what we’ve done by confusing positive tests with cases is basically class a huge number of people who are immune to the disease as having the disease. That’s a massive misconception. —Dr. John Lee, NHS (National Health Service) pathologist in the UK. cf. 14:06 mark Following the Science?
3. ASYMPTOMATIC “CASES” ARE A THREAT
Entire countries began to lockdown the healthy, and continue to do so today, treating them as a viral “threat” — an unprecedented measure in pandemic history. In fact, says the former Vice President and Chief Scientist of vaccine manufacturer Pfizer, it’s a complete fabrication.
Asymptomatic transmission: the concept a perfectly well person can represent a respiratory virus threat to another person; that was invented about a year ago — never been mentioned before in the industry… It’s not possible to have a body full of respiratory virus to the point that you’re an infectious source and for you not to have symptoms… It’s not true that people without symptoms are a strong respiratory virus threat. —April 11th, 2021, interview on The Last American Vagabond
One of the world’s most renowned immunologists agrees:
…it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have COVID-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever. —Professor Beda M. Stadler, PhD, former director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern in Switzerland; Weltwoche (World Week) on June 10th, 2020; cf. backtoreason.medium.com
All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated… There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases… Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases, indicating no “viable virus” in positive cases detected in this study. — “Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China”, Shiyi Cao, Yong Gan et. al, nature.com
Thus, the response of governments flew entirely in the face of established science and pandemic preparedness measures that were already in place, says David Redman. He points to the WHO’s September 2019 guidance document compiled by the best infectious disease doctors in the world: “Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza.”
Out of the 15 [non-pharmaceutical interventions listed in the document]—ones that we’ve come to know, closure of business, closure of schools, isolation of people that have been exposed — all three of those were strongly recommended against in a pandemic of this nature. Why? Because it was known from previous pandemics that those measures have no significant impact on the spread of a viral disease of the nature of COVID. —David Redman, August 2nd, 2021; theepochtimes.com
Quarantine of exposed individuals, entry and exit screening for infection in travellers, border closure, and contact tracing are among the six non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) listed in the WHO document that are not recommended under any circumstances, notes The Epoch Times.
To me it’s stunning that, as a public health scientist, we suddenly threw out these principles that we have sort of used for decades to deal with public health issues. —Dr. Martin Kulldorff , epidemiologist and professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School; —August 10th, 2021, 5:24 mark, Epoch Times
4. MASKS STOP THE SPREAD OF THE VIRUS
One of the most controversial measures aside from lockdowns — which are estimated to have killed millions, in and of themselves, through delayed surgeries, suicides, drug overdoses, and starvationcf. The Enemy is Within the Gates and When I was Hungry — is the mandating of masks. Hundreds of studies had already shown that masking is completely ineffective against influenza, much less a coronavirus, which is several times smaller in size.cf. Unmasking the Facts In fact, long after governments, businesses, and the media claimed that masks worked — without any evidence — the World Health Organization continually published statements to the opposite, including this one on December 1st, 2020:
At present there is only limited and inconsistent scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. — “Mask Use in the Context of COVID-19”, apps.who.int
This has been confirmed by numerous new studies and a mountain of statistical data that the media and the CDC completely ignores.cf. Unmasking the Facts That’s because nothing has changed regarding the very physics of the virus. Dr. Colin Axon, who advises the United Kingdom’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), stated recently:
The small sizes are not easily understood but an imperfect analogy would be to imagine marbles fired at builders’ scaffolding, some might hit a pole and rebound, but obviously most will fly through… A Covid viral particle is around 100 nanometres, material gaps in blue surgical masks are up to 1,000 times that size, cloth mask gaps can be 500,000 times the size… Not everyone carrying Covid is coughing, but they are still breathing, those aerosols escape masks and will render the mask ineffective. —SAGE adviser for the UK Government, July 17th, 2021; The Telegraph
In fact, one of the science advisors to President Joe Biden also admitted recently:
We know today that many of the face cloth coverings that people wear are not very effective in reducing any of the virus movement in or out, either you’re breathing out or breathing in. —Dr. Michael Thomas Osterholm, August 2nd, 2021; CNN interview, :41, rumble.com
While he recommends n95 masks, these too are shown to be ineffective and harmful to those who wear them for extended periods.cf. Unmasking the Facts Masks are causing a lot of harm and potential long-term damage to children, leading many doctors and mask experts to declare them “child abuse.” This past April, a court in Weimar, Germany declared:
The compulsion imposed on school children to wear masks and to keep their distance from each other and from third persons harms the children physically, psychologically, educationally, and in their psychosocial development, without being counterbalanced by more than at best marginal benefit to the children themselves or to third persons. Schools do not play a significant role in the “pandemic” event… There is no evidence that facemasks of various types can reduce the risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2 at all, or even appreciably. This statement is true for people of all ages, including children and adolescents, as well as asymptomatic, presymptomatic, and symptomatic individuals. —April 14th, 20201; 2020news.de; English: jdfor2024.com
Update: In September 2021, a pre-print of a new randomized controlled study from Bangladesh was claimed by the media to definitely end the mask debate. But several researchers have quickly pointed out the highly subjective reporting and questionable controls of the study, including paying off villages to wear masks, self-reporting, and a lack of data on where waves of COVID had already started or were passing, etc., leading one critic to call the whole methodology “junk” and a “dismal day for science.”cf. Bangladesh Mask Study: Do Not Believe the Hype
For one of the most exhaustive articles with footnotes to the most recent studies on masking, see Unmasking the Facts.
5. SOCIAL DISTANCING
Arguably one of the most silly pandemic fables has been the requirement for people to stand anywhere from “three”, to “six”, to “ten or twelve feet” away from each other — depending on which “expert” you talk to. In truth, so-called “social distancing” is a complete fabrication in 2020 that ignores the science of how coronaviruses are spread.
Early on in the epidemic, a story was invented to explain why this should work: The droplets that you breathe out are a certain size and it was claimed that if you were further than 2 meters away from the nearest person, it would allow that time for those droplets to sort of fall to earth, and you wouldn’t breathe them in and therefore wouldn’t catch the virus. This is almost only a made up story. [If you are infected], you are breathing out about 10 million virus particles per breath, nano-meter sized particles. So these particles get into the air and circulate around the air… —Dr. John Lee, NHS (National Health Service) pathologist in the UK, 28:52 in Following the Science?
Indeed, an MIT study confirms that it doesn’t matter if you are 6 or 60 feet away from somebody, or whether you’re wearing a mask (as just explained).
It really has no physical basis because the air a person is breathing while wearing a mask tends to rise and comes down elsewhere in the room so you’re more exposed to the average background than you are to a person at a distance… What our analysis continues to show is that many spaces that have been shut down in fact don’t need to be. Often times the space is large enough, the ventilation is good enough, the amount of time people spend together is such that those spaces can be safely operated even at full capacity and the scientific support for reduced capacity in those spaces is really not very good. I think if you run the numbers, even right now for many types of spaces you’d find that there is not a need for occupancy restrictions… The distancing isn’t helping you that much and it’s also giving you a false sense of security because you’re as safe at 6 feet as you are at 60 feet if you’re indoors. Everyone in that space is at roughly the same risk… —Prof. Martin Z. Bazant, April 23rd, 2021, cnbc.com; Study: pnas.org
Hence, “social distancing” is even more ridiculous when mandated outside.
If you look at the air flow outside, the infected air would be swept away and very unlikely to cause transmission. There are very few recorded instances of outdoor transmission.—Prof. Martin Z. Bazant, April 23rd, 2021, cnbc.com
6. THE “VACCINES” ARE “SAFE AND EFFECTIVE”
The first falsehood is actually labelling the mRNA injections promoted by Pfizer and Moderna as “vaccines.” According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States — and printed in black and white in Moderna’s own registration of their drug — is the statement:
There is nothing conventional about these. Over and over, the world is told on a daily basis that these injections are “safe and effective.” Not according to Dr. Peter McCullough MD, MPH who has worked on drug safety commissions and is the most highly cited scientist in the world in the National Library of Medicine.
A typical new drug at about five deaths, unexplained deaths, we get a black-box warning, your listeners would see it on TV, saying it may cause death. And then at about 50 deaths, it’s pulled off the market. —Dr. Peter McCullough, interview with Alex Newman, transcript: assets-global.website
Indeed, during the 1976 Swine Flue pandemic, the U.S. attempted to vaccinate 55 millions Americans, but the shot caused some 500 cases of paralysis and 25 deaths.
The program was killed, at 25 deaths. —Ibid; assets-global.website
With these inoculations, however, the official reporting site in the United States (VAERS) has reported over 13,068 deaths and 17,228 permanent disabilities post-injection (697,564 adverse reactions excluding deaths). In Europe (EudraVigilance), over 21,766 are dead with 2,074,410 reported injuries (for links to the official databases, see The Tolls).
We have independent evaluations suggesting 86% [of deaths in the U.S. — 13,068 as of this writing] is related to the vaccine [and] is far beyond anything that is acceptable… It’s going to go down in history as the most dangerous biological-medicinal product rollout in human history. —Dr. Peter McCullough, July 21st, 2021, Stew Peters Show, rumble.com at 17:38
Finally, few in the public seem to realize that the clinical trials are still ongoing making those who are inoculated a part of what scientists are calling the “largest human experiment in history”, as confirmed by Moderna.
Facebook is notorious for their false banners declaring the “vaccines” as safe. On the contrary, the long term trials of these COVID shots were waived and the injections were authorized for “emergency use” by governments, even before clinical trials had been completed or peer-reviewed, and thus the long term side effects are unknown. It is precisely these concerns that renowned scientists all over the world have raised — and Facebook has frequently censored. Hear their warnings in the documentary Following the Science? and hear/see actual testimonies of injuries, etc. at the uncensored MeWe Group: “COVID Vaccine Adverse Reactions Testimonies. One such recent testimony was relayed to me by a man whose brother is a cab driver. “He cannot divulge info BUT… he has nurses that tell him NOT to get the vax as he would not believe what it is doing to people, especially the elderly” (see this report from Australia claiming a coverup of vax deaths and injuries).
The real concern voiced by immunologists and virologists around the world, including the award winning Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, is what will happen a year or two from now to those who took this gene therapy.
There is going to be an auto-attack… You are going to plant the seed of auto-immune reactions. And I tell you for Christmas, don’t do this. The dear Lord did not want humans, not even [Dr.] Fauci, going around injecting foreign genes into the body… it’s horrifying, it’s horrifying. —The Highwire, December 17th, 2020
7. THE mRNA INJECTIONS PROVIDE “HERD IMMUNITY”
The mRNA injections were never tested as to whether they would stop transmission of the virus. Rather, they were developed to reduce symptoms as a gene therapy.
The studies [on the mRNA inoculations] aren’t designed to assess transmission. They don’t ask that question, and there’s really no information on this at this point in time. —Dr. Larry Corey oversees the National Institutes of Health (NIH) COVID-19 “vaccine” trials; November 20th, 2020; medscape.com; cf. primarydoctor.org/covidvaccine
They were tested with an outcome of severe disease — not preventing infection. —U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams, Good Morning America, December 14th, 2020; dailymail.co.uk
Indeed, so-called “breakthrough cases” among the vaccinated are no surprise to doctors who understand the nature of these injections. In Israel, which claims vaccination rates over 62% of the populace, it is being reported by Dr. Kobi Haviv, the medical director of Herzog hospital, the third largest in Israel, that “95% of the severe patients are vaccinated” and that “85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people.”sarahwestall.com; cf. The Tolls Health Ministry data shows “Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection.”israelnationnews.com In the U.K., the death rate is 6.6 times higher among the vaccinated,0.636% compared to .0957% according to a new report, suggesting that the injections are ruining recipient’s immune systems, as was warned. I have personally contacted a nurse in Edmonton, Alberta who said the ICU during a recent peak involved many who were “vaccinated”. I have heard this story repeated anecdotally throughout the world, mostly from nurses and doctors usually too afraid to speak publicly for fear of losing their jobs. For example….
The so-called Covid-19 vaccine is not a vaccine at all. It’s a dangerous, experimental gene therapy. The Center for Disease Control, the CDC, gives the definition of the term vaccine on its website. A vaccine is a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease. Immunity is the protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without being infected. This so-called Covid-19 vaccine does not provide any individual who receives the vaccine with immunity to Covid-19. Nor does it prevent the spread of the disease. —Dr. Stephen Hotze, M.D., February 26th, 2021; hotzehwc.com
Recently, Sarah Westall reported that attorney Tom Renz, who is suing the CDC & DHHS and others on behalf of America’s Frontline Doctors, stated that he is hearing from doctors all over the United States that their ICUs are filling up with most vaccinated patients:
I got an email from an ICU doctor whose hospital was going to try and make her take the vaccine, and this person says ‘In my ICU, 31 of the 34 patients for COVID, because there is 34 there, 31 of them are vaccinated and are actually having vaccine reactions, it’s not COVID.’ And she said, ‘I don’t want to take this vaccine, what can I do?’… This is something I get all over the country. This is an outright lie, and we know it’s a lie.” —sarahwestall.com
So why do the media and TV health pundits continue to speak of herd immunity as if it can be achieved with these particular injections when they are doing the opposite? And yet, we hear claims now that some ICU’s in Texas and Louisiana are apparently seeing more unvaccinated than not. Even if that is the case — and already the media has been caught exaggerating once again — to blame the unvaccinated is wrong-headed. I’ll address that in No. 8.
South Florida nurse shares her firsthand ICU experience…
8. EVERYONE IS IN DANGER FROM COVID-19
This reminds me of the AIDs campaigns in the 1990’s where billboards and television ads warned that everyone was at risk of getting AIDs and, therefore, ought to use condoms. In truth, if you stayed faithful to your spouse or remained chaste before marriage, or did not require a blood transfusion, there was essentially zero risk.
So too with COVID-19, the media loved to terrorize their audience with the extremely rare cases where someone young dies from the disease suggesting, therefore, that everyone is at high risk. In truth, the danger is markedly different for those who are much older. The prestigious Nature journal reported:
For every 1,000 people infected with the coronavirus who are under the age of 50, almost none will die. For people in their fifties and early sixties, about five will die — more men than women. The risk then climbs steeply as the years accrue. For every 1,000 people in their mid-seventies or older who are infected, around 116 will die. — August 28th, 2020; nature.com
Not unlike seasonal influenza, which can kill up to 600,000 globally each year, COVID-19 is also particularly hard on the aged with pre-existing health conditions.cebm.net The U.S. Centers for Disease Controls’ (CDC) reported that only 5% of the total death count had COVID-19 listed as “the only cause mentioned on the death certificate.”cdc.gov The remaining 95% mortalities had an average of 2.6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that contributed to their deaths. In other words, with rare exceptions, COVID-19 is at most a nasty flu for the majority of the population with a high survival rate over 99.7%.cdc.gov
Dr. Martin Kulldorff is an epidemiologist and professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. He calls the global COVID response that locked down healthy, low risk individuals as the “biggest public health fiasco in history.”
While anybody can get infected by COVID, there’s more than thousand fold difference in the risk for death in the mortality rates for the oldest and the youngest… The risk from COVID for children is less than the risk from annual influenza, which is already low for children. —August 10th, 2021, Epoch Times
Which is why insisting on injecting children with an experimental vaccine is rightly considered child abuse and a violation of the Nuremburg Code, which forbids involuntary medical experimentation on anyone.
Medical censorship is the greatest danger to truth for health that I have seen in my career. This is especially true when we have critical information on deaths and escalating medical risks with these experimental COVID shots that we have a duty to release to the public to save lives. —Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, President and Chief Executive Officer of Truth for Health, August 4th, 2021; stoptheshot.com
9. THE UNVACCINATED ARE THE THREAT
This is perhaps the most dangerous and unsubstantiated lie in the media, which is fomenting a true medical apartheid. Mandatory vaccines and “vaccine passports” are now instruments being used to demonize those who refuse to become part of this experiment, or who already have natural immunity. Dr. Peter McCullough stated before a Senate Committee Hearing that Texas was already at 80% “herd immunity” before any vaccine campaign began.
You can’t beat natural immunity. You can’t vaccinate on top of it and make it better. —Dr. Peter McCullough, March 10th, 2021; cf. documentary Following the Science?
MIT’s Technology Review reported a new study showing that “Covid-19 patients who recovered from the disease still have robust immunity from the coronavirus eight months after infection”January 6th, 2021; technologyreview.com and Nature published a study in late May 2021 showing that “People who recover from mild COVID-19 have bone-marrow cells that can churn out antibodies for decades.”May 26th, 2021; nature.com
For some reason, people are in denial of the fact that actually, at the moment, one of the reasons we’re enjoying the situation we currently have, is because there has been a substantial build up of “herd immunity.” —Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Oxford epidemiologist in Following the Science?
The argument presented by obedient news anchors is that the unvaccinated will cause “variants” that will somehow evade the “vaccines.” However, there are always variants with any coronavirus and that will continue to be the case with SARS-CoV-2 for decades to come, state epidemiologists. The idea that one can completely eradicate such a virus has no basis in science. While variants are more contagious, says Dr. Mike Yeadon, they tend to be less harmful and so close in nature to the original virus, that one remains immune once infected:
Once you’ve been infected, you’re immune. There’s no uncertainty about it. It’s been studied hundreds of times now, lots of literature has been published. So, once you’ve been infected, often you’ll have no symptoms, you’ll probably be immune for decades. Dr. Mike Yeadon, cf. 34:05, Following the Science?
Dr. Kulldorff states:
It’s not surprising that you have variants, and that you some variants sort of take over, so this is not at all surprising. The “Delta variant” might be somewhat more contagious, but that’s not a game-changer. What would be a game-changer is if you got a variant that started to kill young people, started to kill children, and the Delta variant is not doing that [in any statistically significant way]… What we know is that if you have had COVID, you have very good immunity — not only for the same variant, but also for other variants. And even for other types, cross-immunity, for other types of coronaviruses.—Dr. Martin Kulldorff, August 10th, 2021, Epoch Times
However, there may be one exception to this.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM as well as Nobel Prize laureate Prof. Luc Montagnier warned that, vaccinating with this type of injection during a pandemic is a huge mistake and could force a more lethal variant. This has been a subject of debate among scientists. We published excerpts from Dr. Vanden Bossche’s Open Letter shortly after it was released in March 2021 (see Grave Warnings):
…this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic. Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Unless I am scientifically proven wrong, it is difficult to understand how current human interventions will prevent circulating variants from turning into a wild monster… Basically, we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectous virus that completely resists our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system. From all of the above, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not going to wipe out large parts of our human population.
But as usual, he was censored and gagged by the media.
While one can barely make any incorrect scientific statements without being criticized by peers, it seems like the elite of scientists who are currently advising our world leaders prefer to stay silent. Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table. Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity? We can hardly say we didn’t know—or were not warned. —Open Letter, March 6th, 2021; watch an interview on this warning with Dr. Vanden Bossche here or here. (Read how Dr. Vanden Bossche is a contemporary “Moishie” in Our 1942)
Dr. Vanden Bossche may be in a conflict of interest since he is actively working on a more suitable vaccine, according to his Linkedin account. But Dr. Montagnier makes the same assertion:
Mass vaccinations are a “scientific error as well as a medical error,” he said. “It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.” —May 18th, 2021; interview with Pierre Barnérias, rairfoundation.com
In fact, a study in 2015 found that “imperfect vaccination can enhance the transmission of highly virulent pathogens.” ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516275/ The current COVID-19 shots are the perfect example of such “leaky vaccines” since they do not stop the transmission of the virus but only reduce symptoms (while also causing the most unprecedented adverse reactions ever recorded in the history of a vaccine campaign). Hence, it is no surprise that we have seen reportseg. here and here that it is the vaccinated who are driving new outbreaks initially at the very same time that the mass vaccination has been rolled out. Indeed, a groundbreaking preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published August 10th, 2021 in The Lancet, “found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.”childrenshealthdefense.org
Yet, with one harmonious voice, the CDC and American media began to proclaim in mid-July that we are in a “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated”. New York Times, July 16th, 2021 However, that new mantra, which is leading to a persecution of the unvaccinated unlike anything we’ve ever seen, is another “sleight of hand” abusing the truth:
As it turns out, to achieve those statistics, the CDC included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021. It does not include more recent data or data related to the Delta variant, which is now the most prevalent strain in circulation. The problem is, the vast majority of the United States population was unvaccinated during that timeframe. January 1, 2021, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots,bloomberg.com and as of June 15, 48.7% were fully “vaccinated.”mayoclinic.com Keep in mind that you’re not “fully vaccinated” until two weeks after your second dose (in the case of Pfizer or Moderna), which is given six weeks after your first shot. This is according to the CDC.cdc.gov —Dr. Joseph Mercola, August 16th, 2021, mercola.com
Canadian viral immunologist and vaccine researcher Dr. Byram Bridle, who revealed data earlier this year that the toxic “spike protein” in these mRNA “vaccines” accumulates throughout the body, especially the ovaries cf. Following the Science? — shot down the claim that ‘we’re in a pandemic of the unvaxxed, and that the unvaccinated are hotbeds for dangerous variants’:
Absolutely, it’s untrue to be calling this a pandemic of the unvaccinated. And it’s certainly untrue… that the unvaccinated are somehow driving the emergence of the novel variants. This goes against every scientific principle that we understand.
The reality is, the nature of the vaccines we are using right now, and the way we’re rolling them out, are going to be applying selective pressure to this virus to promote the emergence of new variants. Again, this is based on sound principles. —August 16th, 2021, mercola.com
In other words, it is the current vaccine campaign and the “vaccinated” — not the unvaccinated — which appears to have created the emerging situation. The evolutionary genetics theory, Muller’s Ratchet, states that as an outbreak starts to peter out, the virus tends to mutate into a more transmissible form, but at the same time it grows weaker. Dr. McCullough presents other data suggesting the Delta Variant is consistent with that theory.
The good news is on the 18th of June, the United Kingdom presented their 16th report assets.publishing.service.gov.uk on the mutations — and they’re doing a great job, much better than our CDC — and what they demonstrated is that the Delta is more contagious but it’s far less deadly, far less worrisome. In fact, it’s a much weaker virus than both the U.K. [Alpha] and the South African [Beta] variants. —Dr. Peter McCullough, June 22, 2021; The Laura Ingraham Show, youtube.com
Under either scenario, the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” in this context is a fable.
• August 1, 2021, director of Israel’s Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, announced half of all COVID-19 infections were among the fully vaccinated.bloomberg.com Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated are also emerging, she said, particularly in those over the age of 60.
A few days later, August 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely ill COVID-19 patients are fully vaccinated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID-related hospitalizations overall.americanfaith.com As of August 2, 2021, 66.9% of Israelis had received at least one dose of Pfizer’s injection, which is used exclusively in Israel; 62.2% had received two doses.ourworldindata.com
• A CDC investigation of an outbreak in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, between July 6 through July 25, 2021, found 74% of those who received a diagnosis of COVID19, and 80% of hospitalizations, were among the fully vaccinated.cdc.gov; cnbc.com Most, but not all, had the Delta variant of the virus.
The CDC also found that fully vaccinated individuals who contract the infection have as high a viral load in their nasal passages as unvaccinated individuals who get infected.22 This means the vaccinated are just as infectious as the unvaccinated.
10. THERE IS NO HOPE OUTSIDE MASS VACCINATION
Perhaps one of the biggest lies is that we are helpless — that mankind is going to be wiped out by this disease unless we all rush to not only be injected by an experimental gene therapy with unknown long term effects, but that we will require future booster shots, perhaps indefinitely. Big Pharma’s dream and long game has been to turn the world into vaccine junkies with trillions of dollars in profits at stake.cf. The Case Against Gates
On the contrary, it is well documented that both Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin have huge success rates in the treatment of COVID-19 — no matter what the media tells you. In fact, the one study in The Lancet that put Hydroxychloroquine in a bad light had to be retracted — a fraudulent “fake paper”, stated several observers.cf. Following the Science? On the other hand, a new study shows that there are 84% fewer hospitalizations for those treated with a “low-dose hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc and azithromycin.”November 25th, 2020; Washington Examiner, cf. preliminary: sciencedirect.com Vitamin D is now shown to reduce coronavirus risk by 54%.bostonherald.com; Sept. 17th, 2020 study: journals.plos.org And the evidence for Ivermectin, used successfully in several countries, is that it is a near miracle drug: cheap, safe, and effective.
Mountains of data have emerged from many centers and countries around the world, showing the miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin. It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. If you take it, you will not get sick. —Dr. Pierre Kory, Senate December 8th, 2020; cnsnews.com
A real-time meta-analyses of 63 studies on Ivermectin show as high as a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis].ivermeta.com So if someone says to you, “Oh, my ICU is full of COVID patients right now.” Your response should be, “It’s too bad they’re being deprived of Ivermectin, etc.”. Dr. Vladimir Zelenko has successfully treated thousands of COVID-19 patients with this: prophylaxis protocol and treatment. You can hear Dr. Zelenko discuss this, along with serious warnings of ignoring these protocols, here.
In fact, in one of the more breathtaking moments in this whole pandemic response, leading vaccine developer, Pfizer, published a tweet saying that, actually, an antiviral treatment (which is what Ivermectin is) will be necessary after all to be successful against COVID-19. The irony in this is stunning — only overshadowed by the fact that, lo and behold, Pfizer has just the drug now in trials. But there you have it in black and white: the “vaccine” doesn’t work as advertised, and the very treatments that have been viciously censored will be necessary. Of course, just not those treatments.
The mainstream and social media’s censorship of these truths is the biggest sign that you are in the midst of a mass propaganda campaign on behalf of some of the most powerful “health” brokers in the world. If they really cared, they’d simply let you hear the facts and let doctors do what they’ve always done: prescribe what is most suitable to the situation. In fact, the obsession with injecting everyone, including babies — and making this mandatory — has created more damage to the trust in both government and medical institutions than anything else in recent memory.
Those who are pushing these vaccine mandates and vaccine passports — vaccine fanatics, I would call them — to me, they have done much more damage during this year than anti-vaxxers have done in two decades.—Dr. Martin Kulldorff, August 10th, 2021, 0:00 mark Epoch Times
In and of itself, fear must NEVER be used as a tool in response. If it is, it will have uncontrollable, long term, severe, unpredictable collateral damage. —David Redman, July 2021, “Canada’s Deadly Response to COVID-19“, pg. 37
Without solid science, fear, unfortunately, is the only tool left to the compromised mainstream and social media giants. And sadly, it’s working with “unpredictable” and potentially horrific consequences once this experiment is done…
OK, ONE LAST FABLE: COVID IS OUR ONLY PROBLEM
You’d think so, given the daily news reports by the minute and hour for over a year and a half now. But ignoring all the other health issues with the single goal that “ALL MUST BE VACCINATED” is as dangerous as it is bizarre.
Public Health is about all health outcomes. It’s not just about one disease like COVID. You can’t just focus on COVID and ignore everything else. —Dr. Martin Kulldorff, August 10th, 2021, 5:40 mark Epoch Times
In one of the most powerful and balanced statements from a clergyman, French Bishop Marc Aillet warned that the myopic approach to health by government officials is leading to a social disaster.
In 2018 there were 157000 deaths in France due to cancer! It took a long time to talk about the inhuman treatment that was imposed in care homes on the elderly, who were shut in, sometimes locked in their rooms, with family visits being prohibited. There are many testimonies concerning the psychological disturbance and even the premature death of our elders. Little is said about the significant increase in depression among individuals who were unprepared. Psychiatric hospitals are overloaded here and there, pyschologists’ waiting-rooms are crowded, a sign that French mental health is worsening – a cause for concern, as the Health Minister has just publicly acknowledged. There have been denunciations of the risk of “social euthanasia”, given estimations that 4 million of our fellow citizens find themselves in situations of extreme loneliness, not to mention the additional million in France who, since the first confinement, have fallen below the poverty threshold. And what about small businesses, the suffocation of small traders who will be forced to file for bankruptcy? …man is “one in body and soul”, it is not right to turn physical health into an absolute value to the point of sacrificing the psychological and spiritual health of citizens, and in particular to deprive them of freely practicing their religion, which experience proves to be essential for their equilibrium.
Fear is not a good counsellor: it leads to ill-advised attitudes, it sets people against one another, it generates a climate of tension and even violence. We may well be on the verge of an explosion! —Bishop Marc Aillet for the diocesan magazine Notre Eglise (“Our Church”), December 2020; countdowntothekingdom.com
Setting aside all the serious controversies of how COVID deaths have been determined and calculated — a fable in itselfcf. Following the Science? — John Hopkins University claims that there are over 4.9 million global deaths from COVID-19. Compare that now to the potential deaths and destruction that lockdowns themselves have and will create:
We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of control of the virus… We may well have a doubling of world poverty by early next year. This is a terrible global catastrophe, actually. And so we really do appeal to all world leaders: stop using lockdowns as your primary control method.—Dr. David Nabarro, World Health Organization (WHO) special envoy, October 10th, 2020; The Week in 60 Minutes #6 with Andrew Neil; gloria.tv
…we were already calculating 135 million people around the world, before COVID, marching to the brink of starvation. And now, with the new analysis with COVID, we’re looking at 260 million people, and I’m not talking about hungry. I’m talking about marching toward starvation… we literally could see 300,000 people die per day over a 90-day period. —Dr. David Beasley, Executive Director of The United Nations World Food Program; April 22nd, 2020; cbsnews.com
Listen on the following:
Follow Mark and the daily “signs of the times” on MeWe:
To journey with Mark in The Now Word,
click on the banner below to subscribe.
Your email will not be shared with anyone.
|↑1||A paper from South China’s University of Technology claims ‘the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan.'(Feb. 16th, 2020; dailymail.co.uk) In early February 2020, Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the U.S. “Biological Weapons Act”, gave a detailed statement admitting that the 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus is an offensive Biological Warfare Weapon and that the World Health Organization (WHO) already knows about it.(cf. zerohedge.com) An Israeli biological warfare analyst said much the same.(Jan. 26th, 2020; washingtontimes.com) Dr. Peter Chumakov of Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology and Russian Academy of Sciences claims that “while the Wuhan scientists’ goal in creating the coronavirus was not malicious—instead, they were trying to study the pathogenicity of the virus… They did absolutely crazy things… For example, inserts in the genome, which gave the virus the ability to infect human cells.”(zerohedge.com) Professor Luc Montagnier, 2008 Nobel Prize winner for Medicine and the man who discovered the HIV virus in 1983, claims that SARS-CoV-2 is a manipulated virus that was accidentally released from a laboratory in Wuhan, China.(cf. mercola.com) A new documentary, quoting several scientists, points toward COVID-19 as an engineered virus.(mercola.com) A team of Australian scientists has produced new evidence the novel coronavirus shows signs “of human intervention.”(lifesitenews.com; washingtontimes.com) Former head of the British intelligence agency M16, Sir Richard Dearlove, said he believes the COVID-19 virus was created in a lab and spread accidentally.(jpost.com) A joint British-Norwegian study alleges that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) is a “chimera” constructed in a Chinese lab.(Taiwannews.com) Professor Giuseppe Tritto, an internationally known expert in biotechnology and nanotechnology and president of the World Academy of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies (WABT) says that “It was genetically engineered in the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s P4 (high-containment) lab in a program supervised by the Chinese military.”(lifesitnews.com) Respected Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan, who fled Hong Kong after exposing Bejing’s knowledge of the coronavirus well before reports of it emerged, stated that “the meat market in Wuhan is a smoke screen and this virus is not from nature… It comes from the lab in Wuhan.”(dailymail.co.uk ) And former CDC Director Robert Redfield also says COVID-19 ‘most likely’ came from Wuhan lab.(washingtonexaminer.com)|
|↑2||August 11th, 2021; unherd.com|
|↑3||cf. The Case Against Gates|
|↑4||Portugal: geopolitic.org/2020/11/21; the Austrian courts have ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns have no legal or scientific basis. greatgameindia.com|
|↑5||pg. 34, https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download|
|↑6||cf. 9:44 mark in documentary Following the Science?|
|↑9||October 7th, 2020; aapsonline.org|
|↑10||January 7th, 2020, bpa-pathology.com|
|↑11||interview with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich; mercola.com|
|↑12||The Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, August 16, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada; video here|
|↑13||cf. The Case Against Gates|
|↑14||cf. The Enemy is Within the Gates and When I was Hungry|
|↑15||cf. Unmasking the Facts|
|↑16||cf. Unmasking the Facts|
|↑17||cf. Unmasking the Facts|
|↑18||cf. Bangladesh Mask Study: Do Not Believe the Hype|
|↑19||sarahwestall.com; cf. The Tolls|
|↑21||0.636% compared to .0957%|
|↑25||January 6th, 2021; technologyreview.com|
|↑26||May 26th, 2021; nature.com|
|↑28||eg. here and here|
|↑30||New York Times, July 16th, 2021|
|↑34||cf. Following the Science?|
|↑42||cf. The Case Against Gates|
|↑43||cf. Following the Science?|
|↑44||November 25th, 2020; Washington Examiner, cf. preliminary: sciencedirect.com|
|↑45||bostonherald.com; Sept. 17th, 2020 study: journals.plos.org|
|↑47||cf. Following the Science?|